The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Composite retrieval of heterogeneous web search
Open accessAbstract
Traditional search systems generally present a ranked list of documents as answers to user queries. In aggregated search systems, results from different and increasingly diverse verticals (image, video, news, etc.) are returned to users. For instance, many such search engines return to users both images and web documents as answers to the query "flower". Aggregated search has become a very popular paradigm. In this paper, we go one step further and study a different search paradigm: composite retrieval. Rather than returning and merging results from different verticals, as is the case with aggregated search, we propose to return to users a set of "bundles", where a bundle is composed of "cohesive" results from several verticals. For example, for the query "London Olympic", one bundle per sport could be returned, each containing results extracted from news, videos, images, or Wikipedia. Composite retrieval can promote exploratory search in a way that helps users understand the diversity of results available for a specific query and decide what to explore in more detail. In this paper, we propose and evaluate a variety of approaches to construct bundles that are relevant, cohesive and diverse. Compared with three baselines (traditional "general web only" ranking, federated search ranking and aggregated search), our evaluation results demonstrate significant performance improvement for a highly heterogeneous web collection.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“Composite retrieval is not a new concept in IR [130], but previous studies refer to the phrase as retrieval paradigms that cluster results from multiple sources and show them in groups for specific user queries [131].”
From Foundations of GenIR (2025) · cites this paper as [130]
Citations
Cites
No references could be resolved yet.
Research works printed but not linked: 25
- 10.1145/1498759.1498766 · DOI
- 10.1145/2487788.2487822 · DOI
- S. Amer-Yahia , F. Bonchi , C. Castillo , E. Feuerstein , I. Méndez-Díaz , and P. Zabala . Composite retrieval of diverse and complementary bundles . 2013 . http://www.optimization-online.org/DB_FILE/2013/02/3785.pdf. S. Amer-Yahia, F. Bonchi, C. Castillo, E. Feuerstein, I. Méndez-Díaz, and P. Zabala. Composite retrieval of diverse and complementary bundles. 2013. http://www.optimization-online.org/DB_FILE/2013/02/3785.pdf.
- 10.1145/1571941.1571997 · DOI
- 10.1145/1807167.1807258 · DOI
- 10.1002/asi.4630300621 · DOI
- 10.1145/1454008.1454037 · DOI
- 10.1145/215206.215328 · DOI
- 10.1145/290941.291025 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1145/1390334.1390446 · DOI
- 10.1145/1810617.1810626 · DOI
- 10.1145/365024.365116 · DOI
- 10.1145/1871437.1871689 · DOI
- 10.1145/1390334.1390428 · DOI
- 10.1145/2396761.2398535 · DOI
- 10.1145/1835449.1835542 · DOI
- 10.5555/2040317.2040349 · DOI
- 10.1561/1500000010 · DOI
- 10.1145/860435.860490 · DOI
- 10.1145/1871437.1871506 · DOI
- 10.1016/S0306-4573(01)00048-6 · DOI
- 10.1145/1864708.1864739 · DOI
- 10.1145/860435.860440 · DOI
- 10.1145/2348283.2348302 · DOI
- 10.1145/2488388.2488524 · DOI
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Ai, Q., Zhan, J., & Liu, Y. (2025) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2501.02842
“Composite retrieval is not a new concept in IR [130], but previous studies refer to the phrase as retrieval paradigms that cluster results from multiple sources and show them in groups for specific user queries [131].”
Metadata
- Authors
- Bota, H., Zhou, K., Jose, J. M., & Lalmas, M.
- Affiliations
- University of Glasgow, Glasgow, United Kingdom
- University of Edinburgh (GB)
- University of Glasgow (GB)
- Yahoo (United Kingdom) (GB)
- Venue
- Proceedings of the 23rd international conference on World wide web
- Publisher
- ACM
- Published
- 2014-04-07
- Pages
- 119-130
- OpenAlex
- W2155304699
- Cited by
- 32
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2025: 1 · 2024: 1 · 2022: 1 · 2020: 3 · 2019: 5 · 2018: 3 · 2017: 4 · 2016: 7 · 2015: 6 · 2014: 1
- FWCI
- 5.12
- Type
- conference paper
- Language
- en
- Open access
- Locations
- International World Wide Web Conference (WWW) (publishedVersion)
- Repository@Nottingham (University of Nottingham) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
- Repository@Nottingham (University of Nottingham) (submittedVersion)
- Funders
- Linguistically Motivated Semantic Aggregation Engines (LiMoSINe3) EU project
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Information Systems › Information Retrieval and Search Behavior
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Information Systems › Recommender Systems and Techniques
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Information Systems › Web Data Mining and Analysis
- Keywords
- aggregated search, exploratory search, federated search
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review