Cited by 32Information Retrieval and Search BehaviorRecommender Systems and TechniquesWeb Data Mining and Analysis

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Composite retrieval of heterogeneous web search

Open access
Bota, Horatiu, Zhou, Ke, Jose, Joemon M., Lalmas, Mounia·2014·Proceedings of the 23rd international conference on World wide web

Abstract

Traditional search systems generally present a ranked list of documents as answers to user queries. In aggregated search systems, results from different and increasingly diverse verticals (image, video, news, etc.) are returned to users. For instance, many such search engines return to users both images and web documents as answers to the query "flower". Aggregated search has become a very popular paradigm. In this paper, we go one step further and study a different search paradigm: composite retrieval. Rather than returning and merging results from different verticals, as is the case with aggregated search, we propose to return to users a set of "bundles", where a bundle is composed of "cohesive" results from several verticals. For example, for the query "London Olympic", one bundle per sport could be returned, each containing results extracted from news, videos, images, or Wikipedia. Composite retrieval can promote exploratory search in a way that helps users understand the diversity of results available for a specific query and decide what to explore in more detail. In this paper, we propose and evaluate a variety of approaches to construct bundles that are relevant, cohesive and diverse. Compared with three baselines (traditional "general web only" ranking, federated search ranking and aggregated search), our evaluation results demonstrate significant performance improvement for a highly heterogeneous web collection.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1145/2566486.2567985

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

No references could be resolved yet.

Research works printed but not linked: 25

  1. 10.1145/1498759.1498766 · DOI
  2. 10.1145/2487788.2487822 · DOI
  3. S. Amer-Yahia , F. Bonchi , C. Castillo , E. Feuerstein , I. Méndez-Díaz , and P. Zabala . Composite retrieval of diverse and complementary bundles . 2013 . http://www.optimization-online.org/DB_FILE/2013/02/3785.pdf. S. Amer-Yahia, F. Bonchi, C. Castillo, E. Feuerstein, I. Méndez-Díaz, and P. Zabala. Composite retrieval of diverse and complementary bundles. 2013. http://www.optimization-online.org/DB_FILE/2013/02/3785.pdf.
  4. 10.1145/1571941.1571997 · DOI
  5. 10.1145/1807167.1807258 · DOI
  6. 10.1002/asi.4630300621 · DOI
  7. 10.1145/1454008.1454037 · DOI
  8. 10.1145/215206.215328 · DOI
  9. 10.1145/290941.291025 · DOI · Paper page
  10. 10.1145/1390334.1390446 · DOI
  11. 10.1145/1810617.1810626 · DOI
  12. 10.1145/365024.365116 · DOI
  13. 10.1145/1871437.1871689 · DOI
  14. 10.1145/1390334.1390428 · DOI
  15. 10.1145/2396761.2398535 · DOI
  16. 10.1145/1835449.1835542 · DOI
  17. 10.5555/2040317.2040349 · DOI
  18. 10.1561/1500000010 · DOI
  19. 10.1145/860435.860490 · DOI
  20. 10.1145/1871437.1871506 · DOI
  21. 10.1016/S0306-4573(01)00048-6 · DOI
  22. 10.1145/1864708.1864739 · DOI
  23. 10.1145/860435.860440 · DOI
  24. 10.1145/2348283.2348302 · DOI
  25. 10.1145/2488388.2488524 · DOI

Cited by

Sorted by citations

  • Foundations of GenIR

    Ai, Q., Zhan, J., & Liu, Y. (2025) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2501.02842

    “Composite retrieval is not a new concept in IR [130], but previous studies refer to the phrase as retrieval paradigms that cluster results from multiple sources and show them in groups for specific user queries [131].”

Metadata

Authors
Bota, H., Zhou, K., Jose, J. M., & Lalmas, M.
Affiliations
  • University of Glasgow, Glasgow, United Kingdom
  • University of Edinburgh (GB)
  • University of Glasgow (GB)
  • Yahoo (United Kingdom) (GB)
Venue
Proceedings of the 23rd international conference on World wide web
Publisher
ACM
Published
2014-04-07
Pages
119-130
OpenAlex
W2155304699
Cited by
32
References
0
Citations by year
2025: 1 · 2024: 1 · 2022: 1 · 2020: 3 · 2019: 5 · 2018: 3 · 2017: 4 · 2016: 7 · 2015: 6 · 2014: 1
FWCI
5.12
Type
conference paper
Language
en
Locations
  • International World Wide Web Conference (WWW) (publishedVersion)
  • Repository@Nottingham (University of Nottingham) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
  • Repository@Nottingham (University of Nottingham) (submittedVersion)
Funders
Linguistically Motivated Semantic Aggregation Engines (LiMoSINe3) EU project
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Information Systems › Information Retrieval and Search Behavior
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Information Systems › Recommender Systems and Techniques
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Information Systems › Web Data Mining and Analysis
Keywords
aggregated search, exploratory search, federated search

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review