Cited by 117Complex Network Analysis TechniquesMedia and Digital CommunicationSocial Media and Politics

Evolution of reddit: from the front page of the internet to a self-referential community?

Singer, Philipp, Flöck, Fabian, Meinhart, Clemens, Zeitfogel, Elias, Strohmaier, Markus·2014·Proceedings of the 23rd International Conference on World Wide Web

Abstract

In the past few years, Reddit -- a community-driven platform for submitting, commenting and rating links and text posts -- has grown exponentially, from a small community of users into one of the largest online communities on the Web. To the best of our knowledge, this work represents the most comprehensive longitudinal study of Reddit's evolution to date, studying both (i) how user submissions have evolved over time and (ii) how the community's allocation of attention and its perception of submissions have changed over 5 years based on an analysis of almost 60 million submissions. Our work reveals an ever-increasing diversification of topics accompanied by a simultaneous concentration towards a few selected domains both in terms of posted submissions as well as perception and attention. By and large, our investigations suggest that Reddit has transformed itself from a dedicated gateway to the Web to an increasingly self-referential community that focuses on and reinforces its own user-generated image- and textual content over external sources.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1145/2567948.2576943

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Reddit users are not representative of the US population and have strong socio-demographic biases.

    “Reddit users are not representative of the US population, and instead have strong socio-demographic biases.”

    From No echo in the chambers of political interactions on Reddit (2021) · cites this paper as [46]

  • The political leaning and general interests of Reddit users may differ from those of the general population.

    “it has been shown that the political leaning and general interests of Reddit users may differ from those of the general population46.”

    From No echo in the chambers of political interactions on Reddit (2021) · cites this paper as [46]

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Singer, P., Flöck, F., Meinhart, C., Zeitfogel, E., & Strohmaier, M.
Affiliations
  • Graz University of Technology (AT)
  • Karlsruhe Institute of Technology (DE)
  • Universität Koblenz (DE)
Venue
Proceedings of the 23rd International Conference on World Wide Web
Publisher
ACM
Published
2014-04-07
Pages
517-522
OpenAlex
W4298502720
Cited by
117
References
1
Citations by year
2026: 10 · 2025: 10 · 2024: 8 · 2023: 10 · 2022: 12 · 2021: 8 · 2020: 11 · 2019: 11 · 2018: 13 · 2017: 9 · 2016: 8 · 2015: 7
FWCI
7.36
Type
conference paper
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
International World Wide Web Conference (WWW) (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • Microsoft
  • Microsoft Research
  • Google
  • Massachusetts Institute of Technology
  • Northwestern University
  • Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute
  • Arizona State University
  • University of Pittsburgh
  • Carnegie Mellon University
  • Pennsylvania State University
  • TU Graz, Internationale Beziehungen und Mobilitätsprogramme
  • Indian National Science Academy
  • University of Patras
  • Northumbria University
  • Politecnico di Torino
  • Institute for Scientific Interchange
  • Skoll Foundation
  • University of Southampton
  • University of St Andrews
  • King's College London
  • University College London
  • University of Oxford
  • University of Glasgow
  • Queen's University Belfast
  • Commonwealth Scientific and Industrial Research Organisation
  • Australian National University
  • National University of Singapore
  • European Research Consortium for Informatics and Mathematics
  • École Polytechnique Fédérale de Lausanne
  • Hong Kong Baptist University
  • Queensland University of Technology
  • Technische Universiteit Delft
  • Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam
  • University of Twente
  • Hanyang University
  • Seoul National University
  • Korea University
  • Sungkyunkwan University
  • Dalian University of Technology
  • Queen's University
  • Universidad Politécnica de Madrid
  • Indian Institute of Technology Madras
  • Tsinghua University
  • Orta Doğu Teknik Üniversitesi
  • Stockholms Läns Landsting
  • Universiteit Gent
  • University of Waterloo
  • University of Tokyo
  • Chinese University of Hong Kong
  • Aston University
  • Universitair Medisch Centrum Groningen
  • Universidad de Chile
  • Université de Fribourg
  • Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin
  • Barcelona Supercomputing Center
  • University of Tsukuba
  • Korea Advanced Institute of Science and Technology
  • Instituto Nacional de Ciência e Tecnologia para Engenharia de Software
  • Institut National des Sciences Appliquées Rouen
  • Rheinische Friedrich-Wilhelms-Universität Bonn
  • Universidade Federal de Pernambuco
  • Universidade de Pernambuco
  • Universität Kassel
  • Universitat Politècnica de Catalunya
  • Région Normandie
  • International Institute of Information Technology, Hyderabad
  • Samsung
  • University of California, Santa Barbara
  • Leibniz-Gemeinschaft
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Statistical and Nonlinear Physics › Complex Network Analysis Techniques
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Networks and Communications › Media and Digital Communication
  • Social Sciences › Communication › Social Media and Politics
Keywords
Reddit, online communities, user-generated content, attention allocation, community evolution, longitudinal analysis, content rating

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review