Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 187

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Lifestreams: an alternative to the desktop metaphor

Fertig, Scott, Freeman, Eric, Gelernter, David·1996·Conference companion on Human factors in computing systems common ground - CHI '96

Abstract

We contend that managing one's own electronic world can be a frustrating task for most computer users, re- quiring too many separate applications, too many file transfers and format translations, the invention of too many pointless names and the construction of organi- zational hierarchies that too quickly become obsolete. What is needed is a metaphor and system for organiz- ing the electronic bits of paper we all so easily collect, whether we create them ourselves or they come to us in the form of email, downloaded images, web pages, or scheduling reminders. Lifestreams is such a system.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1145/257089.257404

Cites

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cited by

See all 187

Metadata

Authors
Fertig, S., Freeman, E., & Gelernter, D.
Venue
Conference companion on Human factors in computing systems common ground - CHI '96
Publisher
ACM Press
Published
1996
Pages
410-411
OpenAlex
W2115559207
Cited by
187
References
0
FWCI
3.99
Type
conference paper
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Lifestreams: an alternative to the desktop metaphor. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1145/257089.257404
The paper
Fertig, S., Freeman, E., & Gelernter, D. (1996). Lifestreams: an alternative to the desktop metaphor. Conference companion on Human factors in computing systems common ground - CHI '96. https://doi.org/10.1145/257089.257404

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.