The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Feature selection, perception learning, and a usability case study for text categorization
Open accessAbstract
In this paper, we describe an automated learning approach to text categorization based on perception learning and a new feature selection metric, called correlation coefficient.Our approach has been teated on the standard Reuters text categorization collection.Empirical results indicate that our approach outperforms the best published results on this % uters collection.In particular, our new feature selection method yields comiderable improvement.We also investigate the usability of our automated hxu-n-~approach by actually developing a system that categorizes texts into a tree of categories.We compare tbe accuracy of our learning approach to a rrddmsed, expert system ap preach that uses a text categorization shell built by Cams gie Group.Although our automated learning approach still gives a lower accuracy, by appropriately inmrporating a set of manually chosen worda to use as f~ures, the combined, semi-automated approach yields accuracy close to the * baaed approach.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
The perceptron: A probabilistic model for information storage and organization in the brain.
Rosenblatt, F. (1958) · Psychological Review · doi:10.1037/h0042519 · Cited by 12,280
Cited by
A review of affective computing: From unimodal analysis to multimodal fusion
Poria, S., Cambria, E., Bajpai, R., & Hussain, A. (2017) · Information Fusion · doi:10.1016/j.inffus.2017.02.003 · Cited by 1,644
Feature selection for text categorization on imbalanced data
Zheng, Z., Wu, X., & Srihari, R. (2004) · ACM SIGKDD Explorations Newsletter · doi:10.1145/1007730.1007741 · Cited by 549
Mining e-mail content for author identification forensics
de Vel, O., Anderson, A., Corney, M., & Mohay, G. (2001) · ACM SIGMOD Record · doi:10.1145/604264.604272 · Cited by 487
Machine learning techniques for the automation of literature reviews and systematic reviews in EFSA
Jaspers, S., De Troyer, E., & Aerts, M. (2018) · EFSA Supporting Publications · doi:10.2903/sp.efsa.2018.en-1427 · Cited by 36
A Balanced Ensemble Approach to Weighting Classifiers for Text Classification
Cheong Fung, G., Yu, J., Wang, H., Cheung, D., & Liu, H. (2006) · Sixth International Conference on Data Mining (ICDM'06) · doi:10.1109/icdm.2006.2 · Cited by 20
Metadata
- Authors
- Ng, H. T., Goh, W. B., & Low, K. L.
- Venue
- Proceedings of the 20th annual international ACM SIGIR conference on Research and development in information retrieval - SIGIR '97
- Publisher
- ACM Press
- Published
- 1997
- Pages
- 67-73
- OpenAlex
- W1983078185
- Cited by
- 450
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 13.08
- Type
- conference paper
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Feature selection, perception learning, and a usability case study for text categorization. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1145/258525.258537
- The paper
- Ng, H. T., Goh, W. B., & Low, K. L. (1997). Feature selection, perception learning, and a usability case study for text categorization. Proceedings of the 20th annual international ACM SIGIR conference on Research and development in information retrieval - SIGIR '97. https://doi.org/10.1145/258525.258537
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.