The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Integration and synchronization of input modes during multimodal human-computer interaction
Abstract
Our ability to develop robust multimodal systems will depend on knowledge of the natural integration patterns that typify people's combined use of different input modes. To provide a foundation for theory and design, the present research analyzed multimodal interaction while people spoke and wrote to a simulated dynamic map system. Task analysis revealed that multimodal interaction occurred most frequently during spatial location commands, and with intermediate frequency during selection commands. In addition, microanalysis of input signals identified sequential, simultaneous, point-and-speak, and compound integration patterns, as well as data on the temporal precedence of modes and on inter-modal lags. In synchronizing input streams, the temporal precedence of writing over speech was a major theme, with pen input conveying location information first in a sentence. Linguistic analysis also revealed that the spoken and written modes consistently supplied complementary semantic information, rather than redundant. One long-term goal of this research is the development of predictive models of natural modality integration to guide the design of emerging multimodal architectures. Keywords multimodal interaction, integration and synchronization, speech and pen input, dynamic interactive maps, spatial location information, predictive modeling
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Oviatt, S. L., Cohen, P. R., & Wang, M. (1994) · Speech Communication · doi:10.1016/0167-6393(94)90079-5 · Cited by 76 · cited 1×
“A click-to-speak interface was used because off-line speech has been demonstrated to contain as many as 12,400% more unintelligible words than on-line speech directed to the system [13].”
BackgroundSelf-citation
Cited by
Toward an affect-sensitive multimodal human-computer interaction
Pantic, M., & Rothkrantz, L. J. M. (2003) · Proceedings of the IEEE · doi:10.1109/jproc.2003.817122 · Cited by 791
QuickSet: multimodal interaction for distributed applications
Cohen, P. R., Johnston, M., McGee, D., Oviatt, S., Pittman, J., Smith, I., Chen, L., & Clow, J. (1997) · Proceedings of the fifth ACM international conference on Multimedia - MULTIMEDIA '97 · doi:10.1145/266180.266328 · Cited by 466
Self-citationHealth dialog systems for patients and consumers
Bickmore, T., & Giorgino, T. (2006) · Journal of Biomedical Informatics · doi:10.1016/j.jbi.2005.12.004 · Cited by 242
Multimodal error correction for speech user interfaces
Suhm, B., Myers, B., & Waibel, A. (2001) · ACM Transactions on Computer-Human Interaction · doi:10.1145/371127.371166 · Cited by 198
Multimodal integration-a statistical view
Wu, L., Oviatt, S. L., & Cohen, P. R. (1999) · IEEE Transactions on Multimedia · doi:10.1109/6046.807953 · Cited by 190
Self-citation
Metadata
- Authors
- Oviatt, S., DeAngeli, A., & Kuhn, K.
- Venue
- Proceedings of the ACM SIGCHI Conference on Human factors in computing systems
- Publisher
- ACM
- Published
- 1997-03-27
- Pages
- 415-422
- OpenAlex
- W2007465845
- Cited by
- 360
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 13.80
- Type
- conference paper
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Integration and synchronization of input modes during multimodal human-computer interaction. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1145/258549.258821
- The paper
- Oviatt, S., DeAngeli, A., & Kuhn, K. (1997). Integration and synchronization of input modes during multimodal human-computer interaction. Proceedings of the ACM SIGCHI Conference on Human factors in computing systems. https://doi.org/10.1145/258549.258821
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.