Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 271

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 43 of the 43 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

SCAAT: incremental tracking with incomplete information

Open access
Welch, Greg, Bishop, Gary·1997·Proceedings of the 24th annual conference on Computer graphics and interactive techniques - SIGGRAPH '97

Abstract

We present a promising new mathematical method for tracking a user's pose (position and orientation) for interactive computer graphics.The method, which is applicable to a wide variety of both commercial and experimental systems, improves accuracy by properly assimilating sequential observations, filtering sensor measurements, and by concurrently autocalibrating source and sensor devices.It facilitates user motion prediction, multisensor data fusion, and higher report rates with lower latency than previous methods.Tracking systems determine the user's pose by measuring signals from low-level hardware sensors.For reasons of physics and economics, most systems make multiple sequential measurements which are then combined to produce a single tracker report.For example, commercial magnetic trackers using the SPASYN ( Space Synchro ) system sequentially measure three magnetic vectors and then combine them mathematically to produce a report of the sensor pose.Our new approach produces tracker reports as each new lowlevel sensor measurement is made rather than waiting to form a complete collection of observations.Because single observations under-constrain the mathematical solution, we refer to our approach as single-constraint-at-a-time or SCAAT tracking.The key is that the single observations provide some information about the user's state, and thus can be used to incrementally improve a previous estimate.We recursively apply this principle, incorporating new sensor data as soon as it is measured.With this approach we are able to generate estimates more frequently, with less latency, and with improved accuracy.We present results from both an actual implementation, and from extensive simulations.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1145/258734.258876

Cites

43 of 43 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 43 references

Cited by

See all 271

Metadata

Authors
Welch, G., & Bishop, G.
Venue
Proceedings of the 24th annual conference on Computer graphics and interactive techniques - SIGGRAPH '97
Publisher
ACM Press
Published
1997
Pages
333-344
OpenAlex
W1980395864
Cited by
271
References
43
FWCI
7.97
Type
conference paper
Language
en
Open access
bronze

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: SCAAT: incremental tracking with incomplete information. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1145/258734.258876
The paper
Welch, G., & Bishop, G. (1997). SCAAT: incremental tracking with incomplete information. Proceedings of the 24th annual conference on Computer graphics and interactive techniques - SIGGRAPH '97. https://doi.org/10.1145/258734.258876

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.