The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Computer-generated watercolor
Open accessAbstract
This paper describes the various artistic effects of watercolor and shows how they can be simulated automatically.Our watercolor model is based on an ordered set of translucent glazes, which are created independently using a shallow-water fluid simulation.We use a Kubelka-Munk compositing model for simulating the optical effect of the superimposed glazes.We demonstrate how computergenerated watercolor can be used in three different applications: as part of an interactive watercolor paint system, as a method for automatic image "watercolorization," and as a mechanism for nonphotorealistic rendering of three-dimensional scenes.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Linear algebra operators for GPU implementation of numerical algorithms
Krüger, J., & Westermann, R. (2003) · ACM Transactions on Graphics · doi:10.1145/882262.882363 · Cited by 380
Mim, N. J., Nandi, D., Khan, S. S., Dey, A., & Ahmed, S. I. (2024) · Proceedings of the CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems · doi:10.1145/3613904.3641951 · Cited by 42
Metadata
- Authors
- Curtis, C. J., Anderson, S. E., Seims, J. E., Fleischer, K. W., & Salesin, D. H.
- Venue
- Proceedings of the 24th annual conference on Computer graphics and interactive techniques - SIGGRAPH '97
- Publisher
- ACM Press
- Published
- 1997
- Pages
- 421-430
- OpenAlex
- W2070401514
- Cited by
- 457
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 5.67
- Type
- conference paper
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Computer-generated watercolor. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1145/258734.258896
- The paper
- Curtis, C. J., Anderson, S. E., Seims, J. E., Fleischer, K. W., & Salesin, D. H. (1997). Computer-generated watercolor. Proceedings of the 24th annual conference on Computer graphics and interactive techniques - SIGGRAPH '97. https://doi.org/10.1145/258734.258896
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
