Cited by 146Software Engineering ResearchExpert finding and Q&A systemsMobile and Web Applications

The DOI matches its Crossref record; its reference list is not available.

How do API changes trigger stack overflow discussions? a study on the Android SDK

Linares-Vásquez, Mario, Bavota, Gabriele, Di Penta, Massimiliano, Oliveto, Rocco, Poshyvanyk, Denys·2014·Proceedings of the 22nd International Conference on Program Comprehension

Abstract

The growing number of questions related to mobile development in StackOverflow highlights an increasing interest of software developers in mobile programming. For the Android platform, 213,836 questions were tagged with Android-related labels in StackOverflow between July 2008 and August 2012. This paper aims at investigating how changes occurring to Android APIs trigger questions and activity in StackOverflow, and whether this is particularly true for certain kinds of changes. Our findings suggest that Android developers usually have more questions when the behavior of APIs is modified. In addition, deleting public methods from APIs is a trigger for questions that are (i) more discussed and of major interest for the community, and (ii) posted by more experienced developers. In general, results of this paper provide important insights about the use of social media to learn about changes in software ecosystems, and establish solid foundations for building new recommenders for notifying developers/managers about important changes and recommending them relevant crowdsourced solutions

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1145/2597008.2597155

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

No citation lists for this paper

No citation lists for this paper yet — checked again daily.

References 35 · Cited by 146

Research works printed but not linked: 34

  1. A. Bacchelli . Mining challenge 2013: Stack overflow . In The 10th Working Conference on Mining Software Repositories , 2013 . A. Bacchelli. Mining challenge 2013: Stack overflow. In The 10th Working Conference on Mining Software Repositories, 2013.
  2. 10.1145/1806799.1806855 · DOI
  3. 10.1007/s10664-012-9231-y · DOI
  4. G. Bavota , A. Ciemniewska , I. Chulani , A. De Nigro , M. Di Penta , D. Galletti , R. Galoppini , T. Gordon , P. Kedziora , I. Lener , F. Torelli , R. Pratola , J. Pukacki , Y. Rebahi , and S. Garcia Villalonga . The MARKet for Open Source: An intelligent virtual open source marketplace . In IEEE Conference on Software Maintenance, Reengineering and Reverse Engineering (CSMR-WCRE’14) , pages 399– 402 . 2014. G. Bavota, A. Ciemniewska, I. Chulani, A. De Nigro, M. Di Penta, D. Galletti, R. Galoppini, T. Gordon, P. Kedziora, I. Lener, F. Torelli, R. Pratola, J. Pukacki, Y. Rebahi, and S. Garcia Villalonga. The MARKet for Open Source: An intelligent virtual open source marketplace. In IEEE Conference on Software Maintenance, Reengineering and Reverse Engineering (CSMR-WCRE’14), pages 399–402. 2014.
  5. 10.1109/CSMR.2012.39 · DOI
  6. 10.1109/CSMR.2013.14 · DOI
  7. W. J. Conover . Practical Nonparametric Statistics . Wiley , 3 rd edition edition, 1998 . W. J. Conover. Practical Nonparametric Statistics. Wiley, 3rd edition edition, 1998.
  8. 10.5555/2337223.2337230 · DOI
  9. R. J. Grissom and J. J. Kim . Effect sizes for research: A broad practical approach. Lawrence Earlbaum Associates , 2 nd edition edition, 2005 . R. J. Grissom and J. J. Kim. Effect sizes for research: A broad practical approach. Lawrence Earlbaum Associates, 2nd edition edition, 2005.
  10. S. Holm . A simple sequentially rejective Bonferroni test procedure . Scandinavian Journal on Statistics , 6 : 65 – 70 , 1979 . S. Holm. A simple sequentially rejective Bonferroni test procedure. Scandinavian Journal on Statistics, 6:65–70, 1979.
  11. 10.1145/1806799.1806867 · DOI
  12. 10.1109/ICPC.2011.21 · DOI
  13. 10.1109/WCRE.2013.6671289 · DOI · Paper page
  14. 10.1145/2491411.2491428 · DOI
  15. 10.5555/2487085.2487108 · DOI
  16. 10.1145/1978942.1979366 · DOI
  17. 10.1109/ICSM.2013.18 · DOI
  18. I. Mojica , B. Adams , M. Nagappan , S. Dienst , T. Berger , and A. Hassan . A large scale empirical study on software reuse in mobile apps . IEEE Software Special Issue on Next Generation Mobile Computing , 2013 . I. Mojica, B. Adams, M. Nagappan, S. Dienst, T. Berger, and A. Hassan. A large scale empirical study on software reuse in mobile apps. IEEE Software Special Issue on Next Generation Mobile Computing, 2013.
  19. I. Mojica Ruiz , M. Nagappan , B. Adams , and A. Hassan . Understanding reuse in the Android market . In 20th IEEE International Conference on Program Comprehension (ICPC’12) , pages 113– 122 , 2012 . I. Mojica Ruiz, M. Nagappan, B. Adams, and A. Hassan. Understanding reuse in the Android market. In 20th IEEE International Conference on Program Comprehension (ICPC’12), pages 113–122, 2012.
  20. 10.5555/832308.837160 · DOI
  21. 10.1109/ICSM.2012.6405249 · DOI
  22. 10.1109/ICPC.2012.6240510 · DOI
  23. 10.5555/2486788.2486897 · DOI
  24. 10.1145/2393596.2393662 · DOI
  25. 10.1007/s10664-010-9150-8 · DOI
  26. 10.1109/ICPC.2012.6240509 · DOI
  27. 10.1145/2568225.2568313 · DOI
  28. M. Syer , M. Nagappan , B. Adams , and A. Hassan . Revisiting prior empirical findings for mobile apps: An empirical case study on the 15 most popular open-source android apps . In CASCON 2013 , 2013 . M. Syer, M. Nagappan, B. Adams, and A. Hassan. Revisiting prior empirical findings for mobile apps: An empirical case study on the 15 most popular open-source android apps. In CASCON 2013, 2013.
  29. 10.1109/SCAM.2011.25 · DOI
  30. 10.1145/2025113.2025129 · DOI
  31. 10.1145/2531602.2531659 · DOI
  32. 10.1145/2480362.2480557 · DOI
  33. 10.5555/2487085.2487100 · DOI
  34. 10.1109/ICPC.2013.6613842 · DOI

Metadata

Authors
Linares-Vásquez, M., Bavota, G., Di Penta, M., Oliveto, R., & Poshyvanyk, D.
Affiliations
  • College of William and Mary, USA
  • University of Sannio (IT)
  • University of Sannio, Italy
  • University of Molise (IT)
  • William & Mary (US)
Venue
Proceedings of the 22nd International Conference on Program Comprehension
Publisher
ACM
Published
2014-06-02
Pages
83-94
OpenAlex
W1975296856
Cited by
146
References
35
Citations by year
2025: 4 · 2024: 5 · 2023: 8 · 2022: 12 · 2021: 15 · 2020: 18 · 2019: 22 · 2018: 15 · 2017: 14 · 2016: 20 · 2015: 10 · 2014: 3
FWCI
13.33
Type
conference paper
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • International Conference on Program Comprehension (publishedVersion)
  • Open Research (University of Surrey) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Information Systems › Software Engineering Research
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Information Systems › Expert finding and Q&A systems
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Information Systems › Mobile and Web Applications
Keywords
API changes, Android SDK, Stack Overflow, developer questions, developer experience, developer expertise, mobile development

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review