Multidimensional sort of lists in mobile devices
Abstract
Many apps for mobile devices show lists of elements that the user can sort by choosing a single metric, e.g. price or date or alphabetical order. Often, none of the different sorting is ideal, in fact elements that are more interesting to the user are often spread along the list as there is no single sorting that can group them together at the top. We propose that the user can sort the list by including two or more metrics to create a personalized ranking. Sorting is thus multidimensional and the order of the chosen metrics defines a different ranking according to predefined weights. We designed and developed an iOS framework that implements a multidimensional sortable list, with a drag-and-drop interface to let the user choose the personal order of metrics. We performed qualitative user tests with 8 users.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
No preliminary experiment was conducted to evaluate the proposed framework, and the authors did not highlight how the proposed idea was related to mobile-specific context.
“However, no preliminary experiment was conducted to evaluate the proposed framework, and the authors did not highlight how the proposed idea was related to mobilespecific context.”
From Usability Studies on Mobile User Interface Design Patterns: A Systematic Literature Review (2017) · cites this paper as [86]
Users should be enabled to sort items by using multiple criteria.
“Panizzi and Marzo [86] proposed that the users should be enabled to sort items by using multiple criteria.”
From Usability Studies on Mobile User Interface Design Patterns: A Systematic Literature Review (2017) · cites this paper as [86]
- Authors
- Panizzi, E., & Marzo, G.
- Affiliations
- Sapienza University of Rome (IT)
- ORCID
- Panizzi, Emanuele
- Venue
- Proceedings of the 2014 International Working Conference on Advanced Visual Interfaces
- Publisher
- ACM
- Published
- 2014-05-27
- Pages
- 375-376
- OpenAlex
- W1977083336
- Cited by
- 0
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 0.00
- Type
- conference paper
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- International Conference on Advanced Visual Interfaces (AVI) (publishedVersion)
- IRIS Research product catalog (Sapienza University of Rome) (submittedVersion)
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Human-Computer Interaction › Usability and User Interface Design
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Human-Computer Interaction › Interactive and Immersive Displays
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition › Data Visualization and Analytics
- Keywords
- list sorting, personalized ranking, mobile application, drag-and-drop interface, metric weighting, user interface design, user testing
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
