Cited by 11Occupational and Professional Licensing RegulationEngineering Education and Curriculum DevelopmentInformation Systems Education and Curriculum Development

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 10 of the 10 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Licensing professional software engineers: seize the opportunity

Laplante, Phillip A.·2014·Communications of the ACM

Abstract

Professional organizations should be in the forefront of the ongoing discussion about licensing professional software engineers.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1145/2618111

Cites

10 of 10 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

Show all 10 references

Research works printed but not linked: 4

  1. Laplante P.A., 2013, Technology and Society, 32, 1
  2. Laplante P.A., 2005, Technology and Society, 24, 2
  3. Laplante P.A., 2013, United States of America. Software Quality Professional, 15, 1
  4. Starr P., 1982, Basic

Cited by

Sorted by citations

See all 11

Metadata

Authors
Laplante, P. A.
Affiliations
Pennsylvania State University (US)
Corresponding author
Laplante, Phillip A.
Venue
Communications of the ACM
Published
2014-07
Volume
57
Issue
7
Pages
38-40
ISSN
  • 0001-0782 (ISSN-L)
  • 1557-7317
OpenAlex
W1971899500
Cited by
11
References
10
Citations by year
2021: 1 · 2019: 3 · 2018: 1 · 2017: 2 · 2016: 1 · 2015: 1 · 2014: 2
FWCI
4.97
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Communications of the ACM (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Law › Occupational and Professional Licensing Regulation
  • Social Sciences › Education › Engineering Education and Curriculum Development
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Information Systems › Information Systems Education and Curriculum Development
Keywords
professional licensing, professional associations, software engineering profession

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Licensing professional software engineers: seize the opportunity. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1145/2618111
The paper
Laplante, P. A. (2014). Licensing professional software engineers: seize the opportunity. Communications of the ACM. https://doi.org/10.1145/2618111