The DOI matches its Crossref record; 4 of the 4 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
GeoMF: joint geographical modeling and matrix factorization for point-of-interest recommendation
Abstract
Point-of-Interest (POI) recommendation has become an important means to help people discover attractive locations. However, extreme sparsity of user-POI matrices creates a severe challenge. To cope with this challenge, viewing mobility records on location-based social networks (LBSNs) as implicit feedback for POI recommendation, we first propose to exploit weighted matrix factorization for this task since it usually serves collaborative filtering with implicit feedback better. Besides, researchers have recently discovered a spatial clustering phenomenon in human mobility behavior on the LBSNs, i.e., individual visiting locations tend to cluster together, and also demonstrated its effectiveness in POI recommendation, thus we incorporate it into the factorization model. Particularly, we augment users' and POIs' latent factors in the factorization model with activity area vectors of users and influence area vectors of POIs, respectively. Based on such an augmented model, we not only capture the spatial clustering phenomenon in terms of two-dimensional kernel density estimation, but we also explain why the introduction of such a phenomenon into matrix factorization helps to deal with the challenge from matrix sparsity. We then evaluate the proposed algorithm on a large-scale LBSN dataset. The results indicate that weighted matrix factorization is superior to other forms of factorization models and that incorporating the spatial clustering phenomenon into matrix factorization improves recommendation performance.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
The Elements of Statistical Learning
Hastie, T., Tibshirani, R., & Friedman, J. (2009) · Springer Series in Statistics · doi:10.1007/978-0-387-84858-7 · Cited by 25,970
The Elements of Statistical Learning
Hastie, T., Friedman, J., & Tibshirani, R. (2001) · Springer Series in Statistics · doi:10.1007/978-0-387-21606-5 · Cited by 24,162
Solving Least Squares Problems
Lawson, C. L., & Hanson, R. J. (1995) · doi:10.1137/1.9781611971217 · Cited by 7,103
A Random Walk around the City: New Venue Recommendation in Location-Based Social Networks
Noulas, A., Scellato, S., Lathia, N., & Mascolo, C. (2012) · 2012 International Conference on Privacy, Security, Risk and Trust and 2012 International Confernece on Social Computing · doi:10.1109/socialcom-passat.2012.70 · Cited by 184
Cited by
Towards Safety and Sustainability: Designing Local Recommendations for Post-pandemic World
Patro, G. K., Chakraborty, A., Banerjee, A., & Ganguly, N. (2020) · Fourteenth ACM Conference on Recommender Systems · doi:10.1145/3383313.3412251 · Cited by 21
Metadata
- Authors
- Lian, D., Zhao, C., Xie, X., Sun, G., Chen, E., & Rui, Y.
- Venue
- Proceedings of the 20th ACM SIGKDD international conference on Knowledge discovery and data mining
- Publisher
- ACM
- Published
- 2014-08-24
- Pages
- 831-840
- OpenAlex
- W2017921654
- Cited by
- 608
- References
- 4
- FWCI
- 43.03
- Type
- conference paper
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: GeoMF: joint geographical modeling and matrix factorization for point-of-interest recommendation. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1145/2623330.2623638
- The paper
- Lian, D., Zhao, C., Xie, X., Sun, G., Chen, E., & Rui, Y. (2014). GeoMF: joint geographical modeling and matrix factorization for point-of-interest recommendation. Proceedings of the 20th ACM SIGKDD international conference on Knowledge discovery and data mining. https://doi.org/10.1145/2623330.2623638
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.