The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
FastXML: a fast, accurate and stable tree-classifier for extreme multi-label learning
Abstract
The objective in extreme multi-label classification is to learn a classifier that can automatically tag a data point with the most relevant subset of labels from a large label set. Extreme multi-label classification is an important research problem since not only does it enable the tackling of applications with many labels but it also allows the reformulation of ranking problems with certain advantages over existing formulations. Our objective, in this paper, is to develop an extreme multi-label classifier that is faster to train and more accurate at prediction than the state-of-the-art Multi-label Random Forest (MLRF) algorithm [2] and the Label Partitioning for Sub-linear Ranking (LPSR) algorithm [35]. MLRF and LPSR learn a hierarchy to deal with the large number of labels but optimize task independent measures, such as the Gini index or clustering error, in order to learn the hierarchy. Our proposed FastXML algorithm achieves significantly higher accuracies by directly optimizing an nDCG based ranking loss function. We also develop an alternating minimization algorithm for efficiently optimizing the proposed formulation. Experiments reveal that FastXML can be trained on problems with more than a million labels on a standard desktop in eight hours using a single core and in an hour using multiple cores.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
A Theoretical Analysis of NDCG Type Ranking Measures
Wang, Y., Wang, L., Li, Y., He, D., Liu, T.-Y., & Chen, W. (2013) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.1304.6480 · Cited by 351
Cited by
Deep Metric Learning via Lifted Structured Feature Embedding
Song, H. O., Xiang, Y., Jegelka, S., & Savarese, S. (2016) · 2016 IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR) · doi:10.1109/cvpr.2016.434 · Cited by 1,630
Deep Learning for Extreme Multi-label Text Classification
Liu, J., Chang, W.-C., Wu, Y., & Yang, Y. (2017) · Proceedings of the 40th International ACM SIGIR Conference on Research and Development in Information Retrieval · doi:10.1145/3077136.3080834 · Cited by 676
Learning Tree-based Deep Model for Recommender Systems
Zhu, H., Li, X., Zhang, P., Li, G., He, J., Li, H., & Gai, K. (2018) · Proceedings of the 24th ACM SIGKDD International Conference on Knowledge Discovery & Data Mining · doi:10.1145/3219819.3219826 · Cited by 285
SECTOR: A Neural Model for Coherent Topic Segmentation and Classification
Arnold, S., Schneider, R., Cudré-Mauroux, P., Gers, F. A., & Löser, A. (2019) · Transactions of the Association for Computational Linguistics · doi:10.1162/tacl_a_00261 · Cited by 85
Annif: DIY automated subject indexing using multiple algorithms
Suominen, O. (2019) · LIBER Quarterly: The Journal of the Association of European Research Libraries · doi:10.18352/lq.10285 · Cited by 67
Metadata
- Authors
- Prabhu, Y., & Varma, M.
- Venue
- Proceedings of the 20th ACM SIGKDD international conference on Knowledge discovery and data mining
- Publisher
- ACM
- Published
- 2014-08-24
- Pages
- 263-272
- OpenAlex
- W2068074736
- Cited by
- 307
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 10.28
- Type
- conference paper
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: FastXML: a fast, accurate and stable tree-classifier for extreme multi-label learning. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1145/2623330.2623651
- The paper
- Prabhu, Y., & Varma, M. (2014). FastXML: a fast, accurate and stable tree-classifier for extreme multi-label learning. Proceedings of the 20th ACM SIGKDD international conference on Knowledge discovery and data mining. https://doi.org/10.1145/2623330.2623651
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.