The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Deep autoencoder neural networks for gene ontology annotation predictions
Open accessAbstract
The annotation of genomic information is a major challenge in biology and bioinformatics. Existing databases of known gene functions are incomplete and prone to errors, and the bimolecular experiments needed to improve these databases are slow and costly. While computational methods are not a substitute for experimental verification, they can help in two ways: algorithms can aid in the curation of gene annotations by automatically suggesting inaccuracies, and they can predict previously-unidentified gene functions, accelerating the rate of gene function discovery. In this work, we develop an algorithm that achieves both goals using deep autoencoder neural networks. With experiments on gene annotation data from the Gene Ontology project, we show that deep autoencoder networks achieve better performance than other standard machine learning methods, including the popular truncated singular value decomposition.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Singular value decomposition and least squares solutions
Golub, G. H., & Reinsch, C. (1970) · Numerische Mathematik · doi:10.1007/bf02163027 · Cited by 2,929 · cited 1×
“Truncated Singular Value Decomposition (tSVD) [16] is a matrix factorization method that produces a low-rank approximation to a matrix.”
Method
Cited by
DeepFool: A Simple and Accurate Method to Fool Deep Neural Networks
Moosavi-Dezfooli, S.-M., Fawzi, A., & Frossard, P. (2016) · 2016 IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR) · doi:10.1109/cvpr.2016.282 · Cited by 5,317
A State-of-the-Art Survey on Deep Learning Theory and Architectures
Alom, M. Z., Taha, T. M., Yakopcic, C., Westberg, S., Sidike, P., Nasrin, M. S., Hasan, M., Van Essen, B. C., Awwal, A. A. S., & Asari, V. K. (2019) · Electronics · doi:10.3390/electronics8030292 · Cited by 1,620
Deep learning modelling techniques: Current progress, applications, advantages, and challenges
Ahmed, S. F., Alam, M. S. B., Hassan, M., Rozbu, M. R., Ishtiak, T., Rafa, N., Mofijur, M., Shawkat Ali, A. B. M., & Gandomi, A. H. (2023) · Artificial Intelligence Review · doi:10.1007/s10462-023-10466-8 · Cited by 1,079
Deep learning for computational chemistry
Goh, G. B., Hodas, N. O., & Vishnu, A. (2017) · Journal of Computational Chemistry · doi:10.1002/jcc.24764 · Cited by 809
Atzori, M., Cognolato, M., & Müller, H. (2016) · Frontiers in Neurorobotics · doi:10.3389/fnbot.2016.00009 · Cited by 684
“Deep learning methods are also successfully applied to applications requiring to process big amounts of data, such as drug discovery (Ramsundar et al., 2015), compound activity prediction (Dahl et al., 2014) and genomic information annotation (Chicco et al., 2014).”
Method
Metadata
- Authors
- Chicco, D., Sadowski, P., & Baldi, P.
- Venue
- Proceedings of the 5th ACM Conference on Bioinformatics, Computational Biology, and Health Informatics
- Publisher
- ACM
- Published
- 2014-09-20
- Pages
- 533-540
- OpenAlex
- W2022163189
- Cited by
- 182
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 42.68
- Type
- conference paper
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Deep autoencoder neural networks for gene ontology annotation predictions. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1145/2649387.2649442
- The paper
- Chicco, D., Sadowski, P., & Baldi, P. (2014). Deep autoencoder neural networks for gene ontology annotation predictions. Proceedings of the 5th ACM Conference on Bioinformatics, Computational Biology, and Health Informatics. https://doi.org/10.1145/2649387.2649442
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.