The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Dehazing Using Color-Lines
Abstract
Photographs of hazy scenes typically suffer having low contrast and offer a limited visibility of the scene. This article describes a new method for single-image dehazing that relies on a generic regularity in natural images where pixels of small image patches typically exhibit a 1D distribution in RGB color space, known as color-lines. We derive a local formation model that explains the color-lines in the context of hazy scenes and use it for recovering the scene transmission based on the lines' offset from the origin. The lack of a dominant color-line inside a patch or its lack of consistency with the formation model allows us to identify and avoid false predictions. Thus, unlike existing approaches that follow their assumptions across the entire image, our algorithm validates its hypotheses and obtains more reliable estimates where possible. In addition, we describe a Markov random field model dedicated to producing complete and regularized transmission maps given noisy and scattered estimates. Unlike traditional field models that consist of local coupling, the new model is augmented with long-range connections between pixels of similar attributes. These connections allow our algorithm to properly resolve the transmission in isolated regions where nearby pixels do not offer relevant information. An extensive evaluation of our method over different types of images and its comparison to state-of-the-art methods over established benchmark images show a consistent improvement in the accuracy of the estimated scene transmission and recovered haze-free radiances.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Berman, D., Treibitz, T., & Avidan, S. (2016) · 2016 IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR) · doi:10.1109/cvpr.2016.185 · Cited by 1,642
Color balance and fusion for underwater image enhancement
Ancuti, C. O., Ancuti, C., De Vleeschouwer, C., & Bekaert, P. (2018) · IEEE Transactions on Image Processing · doi:10.1109/tip.2017.2759252 · Cited by 1,357
NH-HAZE: An Image Dehazing Benchmark with Non-Homogeneous Hazy and Haze-Free Images
Ancuti, C. O., Ancuti, C., & Timofte, R. (2020) · 2020 IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition Workshops (CVPRW) · doi:10.1109/cvprw50498.2020.00230 · Cited by 517
“Color lines [21] and haze-line [13] priors were built on the observation that the color distribution impacts the color channels distribution.”
BackgroundAll in One Bad Weather Removal Using Architectural Search
Li, R., Tan, R. T., & Cheong, L.-F. (2020) · 2020 IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR) · doi:10.1109/cvpr42600.2020.00324 · Cited by 377
Fast Image Processing with Fully-Convolutional Networks
Chen, Q., Xu, J., & Koltun, V. (2017) · 2017 IEEE International Conference on Computer Vision (ICCV) · doi:10.1109/iccv.2017.273 · Cited by 341
Metadata
- Authors
- Fattal, R.
- Venue
- ACM Transactions on Graphics
- Published
- 2014-12-29
- Volume
- 34
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 1-14
- ISSN
- 0730-0301 (ISSN-L)
- 1557-7368
- OpenAlex
- W2028763589
- Cited by
- 1,167
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 36.79
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Dehazing Using Color-Lines. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1145/2651362
- The paper
- Fattal, R. (2014). Dehazing Using Color-Lines. ACM Transactions on Graphics. https://doi.org/10.1145/2651362
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.