The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Semantics-Aware Android Malware Classification Using Weighted Contextual API Dependency Graphs
Abstract
The drastic increase of Android malware has led to a strong interest in developing methods to automate the malware analysis process. Existing automated Android malware detection and classification methods fall into two general categories: 1) signature-based and 2) machine learning-based. Signature-based approaches can be easily evaded by bytecode-level transformation attacks. Prior learning-based works extract features from application syntax, rather than program semantics, and are also subject to evasion. In this paper, we propose a novel semantic-based approach that classifies Android malware via dependency graphs. To battle transformation attacks, we extract a weighted contextual API dependency graph as program semantics to construct feature sets. To fight against malware variants and zero-day malware, we introduce graph similarity metrics to uncover homogeneous application behaviors while tolerating minor implementation differences. We implement a prototype system, DroidSIFT, in 23 thousand lines of Java code. We evaluate our system using 2200 malware samples and 13500 benign samples. Experiments show that our signature detection can correctly label 93\% of malware instances; our anomaly detector is capable of detecting zero-day malware with a low false negative rate (2\%) and an acceptable false positive rate (5.15\%) for a vetting purpose.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
A Multimodal Deep Learning Method for Android Malware Detection Using Various Features
Kim, T., Kang, B., Rho, M., Sezer, S., & Im, E. G. (2019) · IEEE Transactions on Information Forensics and Security · doi:10.1109/tifs.2018.2866319 · Cited by 518
Droiddetector: android malware characterization and detection using deep learning
Yuan, Z., Lu, Y., & Xue, Y. (2016) · Tsinghua Science and Technology · doi:10.1109/tst.2016.7399288 · Cited by 462
MADAM: Effective and Efficient Behavior-based Android Malware Detection and Prevention
Saracino, A., Sgandurra, D., Dini, G., & Martinelli, F. (2018) · IEEE Transactions on Dependable and Secure Computing · doi:10.1109/tdsc.2016.2536605 · Cited by 434
Scalable Graph-based Bug Search for Firmware Images
Feng, Q., Zhou, R., Xu, C., Cheng, Y., Testa, B., & Yin, H. (2016) · Proceedings of the 2016 ACM SIGSAC Conference on Computer and Communications Security · doi:10.1145/2976749.2978370 · Cited by 401
Self-citationAndroid HIV: A Study of Repackaging Malware for Evading Machine-Learning Detection
Chen, X., Li, C., Wang, D., Wen, S., Zhang, J., Nepal, S., Xiang, Y., & Ren, K. (2020) · IEEE Transactions on Information Forensics and Security · doi:10.1109/tifs.2019.2932228 · Cited by 328
Metadata
- Authors
- Zhang, M., Duan, Y., Yin, H., & Zhao, Z.
- Venue
- Proceedings of the 2014 ACM SIGSAC Conference on Computer and Communications Security
- Publisher
- ACM
- Published
- 2014-11-03
- Pages
- 1105-1116
- OpenAlex
- W2168103835
- Cited by
- 453
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 37.20
- Type
- conference paper
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Semantics-Aware Android Malware Classification Using Weighted Contextual API Dependency Graphs. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1145/2660267.2660359
- The paper
- Zhang, M., Duan, Y., Yin, H., & Zhao, Z. (2014). Semantics-Aware Android Malware Classification Using Weighted Contextual API Dependency Graphs. Proceedings of the 2014 ACM SIGSAC Conference on Computer and Communications Security. https://doi.org/10.1145/2660267.2660359
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.