The DOI matches its Crossref record.
From technology to activity development: the challenge of using students as participants in a PD project
Abstract
The interest of evaluating new information technologies in real-life conditions "in the wild" has recently been increasing. For this new direction, researchers and technology developers need to find the real-life context in which to intervene and the users willing to test the prototype technologies in their everyday practices. Additional complications follow from the ecology of several applications used together. In this paper, experiences from a complex real-life experiment with a set of three research prototypes are analyzed. Based on the results, master-level students are competent users when evaluating individual prototypes but less suitable for integrating separate prototypes into meaningful ecology and envisioning a transition from a traditional way of working to a new one. For this task, users are needed who have a vision of the new and who recognize the problems and tensions between the old and the nascent new.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“Some attempts to that direction exist in the context of architectural education (e.g., Iacucci and Wagner, 2003; Molin-Juustila et al., 2014).”
From Educational Participatory Design in the Crossroads of Histories and Practices – Aiming for Digital Transformation in Language Pedagogy (2023) · cites this paper as Molin-Juustila et al., 2014
In the citing paper
“Previous PD research has also pointed out how difficult it is for master’s level students to envision the transition from the traditional ways of working to new practices enhanced with new technologies without personally encountering the tensions between the old and nascent new (Molin-Juustila et al., 2014).”
From Educational Participatory Design in the Crossroads of Histories and Practices – Aiming for Digital Transformation in Language Pedagogy (2023) · cites this paper as Molin-Juustila et al., 2014
Citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Kinnula, M., Iivari, N., Kuure, L., & Molin-Juustila, T. (2023) · Computer Supported Cooperative Work (CSCW) · doi:10.1007/s10606-023-09473-8 · Cited by 6
“Some attempts to that direction exist in the context of architectural education (e.g., Iacucci and Wagner, 2003; Molin-Juustila et al., 2014).”
BackgroundInfluentialSelf-citation
Metadata
- Authors
- Molin-Juustila, T., Kuutti, K., Nuojua, J., Soudunsaari, L., Juustila, A., & Hentilä, H.-L.
- Affiliations
- University of Oulu (FI)
- Venue
- Proceedings of the 13th Participatory Design Conference on Research Papers - PDC '14
- Publisher
- ACM Press
- Published
- 2014
- Pages
- 81-90
- OpenAlex
- W2074161941
- Cited by
- 1
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2023: 1
- FWCI
- 0.00
- Type
- conference paper
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Human-Computer Interaction › Usability and User Interface Design
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Human-Computer Interaction › Innovative Human-Technology Interaction
- Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Management Information Systems › Information Systems Theories and Implementation
- Keywords
- in-the-wild evaluation, information technology evaluation, activity development, user competence, master's students, prototype integration
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
