Cited by 209Emotion and Mood RecognitionSpeech and Audio ProcessingVoice and Speech Disorders

Vocal and Facial Biomarkers of Depression based on Motor Incoordination and Timing

Williamson, James R., Quatieri, Thomas F., Helfer, Brian S., Ciccarelli, Gregory, Mehta, Daryush D.·2014·Proceedings of the 4th International Workshop on Audio/Visual Emotion Challenge

Abstract

In individuals with major depressive disorder, neurophysiological changes often alter motor control and thus affect the mechanisms controlling speech production and facial expression. These changes are typically associated with psychomotor retardation, a condition marked by slowed neuromotor output that is behaviorally manifested as altered coordination and timing across multiple motor-based properties. Changes in motor outputs can be inferred from vocal acoustics and facial movements as individuals speak. We derive novel multi-scale correlation structure and timing feature sets from audio-based vocal features and video-based facial action units from recordings provided by the 4th International Audio/Video Emotion Challenge (AVEC). The feature sets enable detection of changes in coordination, movement, and timing of vocal and facial gestures that are potentially symptomatic of depression. Combining complementary features in Gaussian mixture model and extreme learning machine classifiers, our multivariate regression scheme predicts Beck depression inventory ratings on the AVEC test set with a root-mean-square error of 8.12 and mean absolute error of 6.31. Future work calls for continued study into detection of neurological disorders based on altered coordination and timing across audio and video modalities.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1145/2661806.2661809

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 43 · Cited by 209

Authors
Williamson, J. R., Quatieri, T. F., Helfer, B. S., Ciccarelli, G., & Mehta, D. D.
Affiliations
MIT Lincoln Laboratory (US)
Venue
Proceedings of the 4th International Workshop on Audio/Visual Emotion Challenge
Publisher
ACM
Published
2014-11-07
Pages
65-72
OpenAlex
W2084242110
Cited by
209
References
43
Citations by year
2026: 10 · 2025: 11 · 2024: 12 · 2023: 9 · 2022: 21 · 2021: 24 · 2020: 19 · 2019: 26 · 2018: 26 · 2017: 23 · 2016: 15 · 2015: 13
FWCI
27.85
Type
conference paper
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
International Workshop on Audio/Visual Emotion Challenge (AVEC) (publishedVersion)
Funders
Assistant Secretary of Defense for Research & Engineering (Air Force contract #FA8721-05-C-0002)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Emotion and Mood Recognition
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Signal Processing › Speech and Audio Processing
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Physiology › Voice and Speech Disorders
Keywords
depression detection, major depressive disorder, vocal biomarkers, facial action units, motor incoordination, movement timing, psychomotor retardation, speech production, facial expressions, multimodal fusion, Beck Depression Inventory, Gaussian mixture model, extreme learning machine, neurophysiological changes

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review