The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Proceedings of the 4th ACM conference on Computer and communications security
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
A survey of trust and reputation systems for online service provision
Jøsang, A., Ismail, R., & Boyd, C. (2007) · Decision Support Systems · doi:10.1016/j.dss.2005.05.019 · Cited by 3,330
PocketLens: Toward a personal recommender system
Miller, B. N., Konstan, J. A., & Riedl, J. (2004) · ACM Transactions on Information Systems · doi:10.1145/1010614.1010618 · Cited by 318
A survey of routing protocols for smart grid communications
Saputro, N., Akkaya, K., & Uludag, S. (2012) · Computer Networks · doi:10.1016/j.comnet.2012.03.027 · Cited by 311
Blockchain based Efficient and Robust Fair Payment for Outsourcing Services in Cloud Computing
Zhang, Y., Deng, R. H., Liu, X., & Zheng, D. (2018) · Information Sciences · doi:10.1016/j.ins.2018.06.018 · Cited by 228
Reputation systems: A survey and taxonomy
Hendrikx, F., Bubendorfer, K., & Chard, R. (2015) · Journal of Parallel and Distributed Computing · doi:10.1016/j.jpdc.2014.08.004 · Cited by 219
Metadata
- Publisher
- ACM
- Published
- 1997-04
- OpenAlex
- W4232485878
- Cited by
- 234
- References
- 0
- Type
- paratext
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Proceedings of the 4th ACM conference on Computer and communications security. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1145/266420
- The paper
- Proceedings of the 4th ACM conference on Computer and communications security. (1997). https://doi.org/10.1145/266420
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
