Worship, Faith, and Evangelism: Religion as an Ideological Lens for Engineering Worlds
Abstract
While some in the CSCW community have researched the values in technology design and engineering practices, the underlying ideologies that reinforce and protect those values remain under-explored. This paper seeks to address this gap by identifying a common ideological framework that appears across four engineering endeavors: the OLPC Project, the National Day of Civic Hacking, the Fixit Clinic, and the Stanford d.school. We found that all four of these communities utilized elements of religious practice to affirm their membership and shared vision. We describe the forms of worship we saw in these engineering worlds, their practices of evangelism, and the ways in which they addressed doubt. We also demonstrate the role mythologies play as ideologically charged narratives. Our discussion of these parallels illuminates the extent and consequences of quasi-religious practices in engineering worlds and illustrates the utility of using religion as a "lens" for understanding ideological commitments in engineering culture.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In computing and F/OSS, evangelizing is widely used to describe efforts to sustain and maintain projects by bringing in more people.
“In computing in general and F/OSS specifically, evangelizing is widely-used to describe efforts to sustain and maintain projects by bringing in more people [1,85].”
From The Labor of Maintaining and Scaling Free and Open-Source Software Projects (2021) · cites this paper as [1]
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 52 · Cited by 61
- Authors
- Ames, M. G., Rosner, D. K., & Erickson, I.
- Affiliations
- University of California, Irvine (US)
- University of Washington (US)
- Rutgers, The State University of New Jersey (US)
- Venue
- Proceedings of the 18th ACM Conference on Computer Supported Cooperative Work & Social Computing
- Publisher
- ACM
- Published
- 2015-02-28
- Pages
- 69-81
- OpenAlex
- W2164844919
- Cited by
- 61
- References
- 52
- Citations by year
- 2026: 3 · 2025: 1 · 2024: 23 · 2023: 2 · 2021: 5 · 2020: 4 · 2019: 2 · 2018: 12 · 2017: 4 · 2016: 3 · 2015: 2
- FWCI
- 5.01
- Type
- conference paper
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- ACM Conference on Computer Supported Cooperative Work (CSCW) (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Science Applications › Open Source Software Innovations
- Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Innovation, Technology, and Society
- Physical Sciences › Engineering › Mechanical Engineering › Design Education and Practice
- Keywords
- religious metaphor, worship, evangelism, faith, doubt, mythology, engineering culture
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review