The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Improved splice site detection in Genie
Abstract
We present an improved splice site predictor for the genefinding program Genie. Genie is based on a generalized Hidden Markov Model (GHMM) that describes the grammar of a legal parse of a multi-exon gene in a DNA sequence. In Genie, probabilities are estimated for gene features by using dynamic programming to combine information from multiple content and signal sensors, including sensors that integrate matches to homologous sequences from a database. One of the hardest problems in genefinding is to determine the complete gene structure correctly. The splice site sensors are the key signal sensors that address this problem. We replaced the existing splice site sensors in Genie with two novel neural networks based on dinucleotide frequencies. Using these novel sensors, Genie shows significant improvements in the sensitivity and specificity of gene structure identification. Experimental results in tests using a standard set of annotated genes showed that Genie identified 86% of coding nucleotides correctly with a specificity of 85%, versus 80% and 84% in the older system. In further splice site experiments, we also looked at correlations between splice site scores and intron and exon lengths, as well as at the effect of distance to the nearest splice site on false positive rates.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
An introduction to hidden Markov models
Rabiner, L., & Juang, B. (1986) · IEEE ASSP Magazine · doi:10.1109/massp.1986.1165342 · Cited by 4,775
Cited by
Predicting splicing from primary sequence with deep learning
Jaganathan, K., Kyriazopoulou Panagiotopoulou, S., McRae, J. F., Darbandi, S. F., Knowles, D., Li, Y. I., Kosmicki, J. A., Arbelaez, J., Cui, W., Schwartz, G. B., et al. (2019) · Cell · doi:10.1016/j.cell.2018.12.015 · Cited by 2,853
Improving genetic diagnosis in Mendelian disease with transcriptome sequencing
Cummings, B. B., Marshall, J. L., Tukiainen, T., Lek, M., Donkervoort, S., Foley, A. R., Bolduc, V., Waddell, L. B., Sandaradura, S. A., O’Grady, G. L., et al. (2017) · Science Translational Medicine · doi:10.1126/scitranslmed.aal5209 · Cited by 831
Leber congenital amaurosis: Genes, proteins and disease mechanisms
den Hollander, A. I., Roepman, R., Koenekoop, R. K., & Cremers, F. P. M. (2008) · Progress in Retinal and Eye Research · doi:10.1016/j.preteyeres.2008.05.003 · Cited by 811
Retrotransposons regulate host genes in mouse oocytes and preimplantation embryos
Peaston, A. E., Evsikov, A. V., Graber, J. H., de Vries, W. N., Holbrook, A. E., Solter, D., & Knowles, B. B. (2004) · Developmental Cell · doi:10.1016/j.devcel.2004.09.004 · Cited by 710
Mutations in the CEP290 (NPHP6) Gene Are a Frequent Cause of Leber Congenital Amaurosis
den Hollander, A. I., Koenekoop, R. K., Yzer, S., Lopez, I., Arends, M. L., Voesenek, K. E. J., Zonneveld, M. N., Strom, T. M., Meitinger, T., Brunner, H. G., et al. (2006) · The American Journal of Human Genetics · doi:10.1086/507318 · Cited by 668
Metadata
- Authors
- Reese, M. G., Eeckman, F. H., Kulp, D., & Haussler, D.
- Venue
- Proceedings of the first annual international conference on Computational molecular biology - RECOMB '97
- Publisher
- ACM Press
- Published
- 1997
- Volume
- 4
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 232-240
- OpenAlex
- W2056967728
- Cited by
- 1,439
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 46.73
- Type
- conference paper
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Improved splice site detection in Genie. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1145/267521.267766
- The paper
- Reese, M. G., Eeckman, F. H., Kulp, D., & Haussler, D. (1997). Improved splice site detection in Genie. Proceedings of the first annual international conference on Computational molecular biology - RECOMB '97. https://doi.org/10.1145/267521.267766
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.