Tactile Letters: A Tangible Tabletop with Texture Cues Supporting Alphabetic Learning for Dyslexic Children
Abstract
Dyslexic children have great difficulty in learning to read. While research in HCI suggests that tangible user interfaces (TUIs) have the potential to support children learning to read, few studies have explored how to help dyslexic children learn to read. Even fewer studies have specifically investigated the design space of texture cues in TUIs in supporting learning to read. In this paper, we present Tactile Letters, a multimodal tangible tabletop with texture cues developed to support English letter-sound correspondence learning for dyslexic children aged 5-6 years old. This prototype is used as a research instrument to investigate the role of texture cues in a multimodal TUI in alphabetic learning. We discuss the current knowledge gap, the theoretical foundations that informed our core design strategy, and the subsequent design decisions we made while developing Tactile Letters.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Universal Design for Learning and use of technology for planning, reading, writing, communicating, and collaborating are hugely beneficial in promoting inclusivity.
“Universal Design for Learning (UDL) and the use of technology for planning, reading, writing, communicating, and collaborating prove hugely beneficial in promoting inclusivity [20], [30].”
From Neurodiversity and the Accessible University: Exploring Organizational Barriers, Access Labor and Opportunities for Change (2024) · cites this paper as [30]
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Borsotti, V., Begel, A., & Bjørn, P. (2024) · Proceedings of the ACM on Human-Computer Interaction · doi:10.1145/3641011 · Cited by 54 · see citing works
- Authors
- Fan, M., & Antle, A. N.
- Affiliations
- Simon Fraser University (CA)
- Venue
- Proceedings of the Ninth International Conference on Tangible, Embedded, and Embodied Interaction
- Publisher
- ACM
- Published
- 2015-01-15
- Pages
- 673-678
- OpenAlex
- W1982954775
- Cited by
- 21
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2026: 3 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 3 · 2019: 2 · 2018: 4 · 2017: 1 · 2016: 1 · 2015: 1
- FWCI
- 1.77
- Type
- conference paper
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- International Conference on Tangible, Embedded, and Embodied Interaction (TEI) (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Human-Computer Interaction › Interactive and Immersive Displays
- Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Tactile and Sensory Interactions
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Developmental and Educational Psychology › Reading and Literacy Development
- Keywords
- dyslexia, reading acquisition, tangible user interfaces, texture cues, multimodal interfaces, tabletop interfaces, letter-sound correspondence, early childhood education, tactile feedback, design space
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review