The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Transdisciplinary Interaction Design in Design Education
Open accessAbstract
Transdisciplinary design which is the idea of design that transcends disciplinary boundaries has been proposed as a fourth design paradigm of interaction design education, scholarship, and practice alongside the technical, cognitive, and ethnographic paradigms. As an educational concern in particular, its aim is to teach students how to bring a values orientation to interaction design. Its focuses are design frameworks, values and ethics, design for important themes such as sustainability, equity, adaptation, justice, and social responsibility. This panel maps the state of the art in transdisciplinary interaction design education, considering also design scholarship and practice in relation to design education. The panel collects together a group of educators from chosen to provide a global perspective, with panelists from Canada, Denmark, Hong Kong, Korea, and Taiwan.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
HCI research has introduced transdisciplinary design as the fourth design paradigm, alongside the technical, cognitive, and ethnographic paradigms, to approach interaction design education, scholarship, and practice.
“Human–Computer Interaction (HCI) research, on the other hand, has introduced transdisciplinary design as the fourth design paradigm, alongside the technical, cognitive, and ethnographic paradigms, to approach interaction design education, scholarship, and practice (Blevis et al., 2015; Moore and Lottridge, 2010; Blevis and Stolterman, 2009).”
From Educational Participatory Design in the Crossroads of Histories and Practices – Aiming for Digital Transformation in Language Pedagogy (2023) · cites this paper as Blevis et al., 2015
Recent interest and call for transdisciplinary design and design education have so far been hardly acknowledged in CSCW.
“This study and the EPD approach respond to the recent interest and call for transdisciplinary design and design education (Blevis et al., 2015) that have so far been hardly acknowledged in CSCW, even though definitely relevant.”
From Educational Participatory Design in the Crossroads of Histories and Practices – Aiming for Digital Transformation in Language Pedagogy (2023) · cites this paper as Blevis et al., 2015
Citations
Cites
No references could be resolved yet.
Research works printed but not linked: 8
- 10.1145/2674931 · DOI
- 10.1145/1572626.1572636 · DOI · Paper page
- Eli Blevis , and Erik Stolterman . 2008 . The Confluence of Interaction Design and Design: from Disciplinary to Transdisciplinary Perspectives . In Proc. 2008 Design Research Society Conference. Sheffield, UK: Design Research Society. 344/1--12 . Eli Blevis, and Erik Stolterman. 2008. The Confluence of Interaction Design and Design: from Disciplinary to Transdisciplinary Perspectives. In Proc. 2008 Design Research Society Conference. Sheffield, UK: Design Research Society. 344/1--12.
- 10.1145/1182475.1182476 · DOI
- Steve Harrison , Deborah Tatar , and Phoebe Sengers . 2007 . The Three Paradigms of HCI . In Proceedings of CHI 2007, Alt.CHI. ACM, New York. Steve Harrison, Deborah Tatar, and Phoebe Sengers. 2007. The Three Paradigms of HCI. In Proceedings of CHI 2007, Alt.CHI. ACM, New York.
- 10.1016/j.ecolecon.2005.01.014 · DOI
- Basarab Nicolescu . Manifesto of Transdisciplinarity . State University of New York Press . Basarab Nicolescu. Manifesto of Transdisciplinarity. State University of New York Press.
- 10.1145/1978822.1978834 · DOI · Paper page
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Kinnula, M., Iivari, N., Kuure, L., & Molin-Juustila, T. (2023) · Computer Supported Cooperative Work (CSCW) · doi:10.1007/s10606-023-09473-8 · Cited by 6
“This study and the EPD approach respond to the recent interest and call for trans-disciplinary design and design education (Blevis et al., 2015) that have so far been hardly acknowledged in CSCW, even though definitely relevant.”
Background
Metadata
- Authors
- Blevis, E., Koskinen, I. K., Lee, K.-P., Bødker, S., Chen, L.-L., Lim, Y.-K., Wei, H., & Wakkary, R.
- Affiliations
- Indiana University Bloomington (US)
- Hong Kong Polytechnic University (HK)
- Korea Advanced Institute of Science and Technology (KR)
- Aarhus University (DK)
- National Taiwan University of Science and Technology (TW)
- Simon Fraser University (CA)
- ORCID
- Venue
- Proceedings of the 33rd Annual ACM Conference Extended Abstracts on Human Factors in Computing Systems
- Publisher
- ACM
- Published
- 2015-04-18
- Pages
- 833-838
- OpenAlex
- W2028305262
- Cited by
- 18
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2024: 2 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 4 · 2020: 2 · 2019: 2 · 2018: 1 · 2017: 1 · 2016: 1 · 2015: 1
- FWCI
- 3.59
- Type
- conference paper
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
- hdl.handle.net
- Licence
- Locations
- CHI Conference Extended Abstracts on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI EA) (publishedVersion)
- TU/e Research Portal (publishedVersion)
- TU/e Research Portal (submittedVersion)
- PolyU Institutional Research Archive (Hong Kong Polytechnic University) (submittedVersion)
- Summit (Simon Fraser University) (submittedVersion)
- UNSWorks (University of New South Wales, Sydney, Australia) (submittedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Engineering › Mechanical Engineering › Design Education and Practice
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Human-Computer Interaction › Innovative Human-Technology Interaction
- Social Sciences › Education › Engineering Education and Pedagogy
- Keywords
- transdisciplinary design, interaction design education, design paradigms, values orientation, design ethics, design framework, sustainability, equity, social responsibility, design scholarship
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
