Cited by 23Advanced Software Engineering MethodologiesModel-Driven Software Engineering TechniquesSoftware System Performance and Reliability

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Control Theory for Model-based Performance-driven Software Adaptation

Open access
Arcelli, Davide, Cortellessa, Vittorio, Filieri, Antonio, Leva, Alberto·2015·Proceedings of the 11th International ACM SIGSOFT Conference on Quality of Software Architectures

Abstract

Self-adaptive techniques have been introduced in the last few years to tackle the growing complexity of software systems, where a major complexity factor leans on their dynamic nature subject to sudden and unpredictable changes that can heavily impact on the software architecture quality. Non-functional models, as generated from architectural descriptions of software, have been proven as effective instruments to support designers meeting non-functional requirements since the early architectural phases. However, such models still lack of intrinsic support for adaptable software. Goal of this paper is to extend the modeling capabilities to the case of software adaptation aimed at satisfying performance requirements. In particular, we illustrate how control theory can solve the problem of keeping within pre-defined ranges the indices of a Queueing Network model (such as queue length) through software adaptation actions (such as replacing software services with less resource-demanding ones), while the model is subject to disturbances (such as workload and/or operational profile variations). For this goal we first introduce a library of Modelica components that represent Queueing Network (QN) elements with adaptable parameters (that can be used as knobs for adaptation actions). Then we use such components to build ``adaptable`` QN models that are subject to disturbances. Finally, in the same framework, we introduce controllers that drive the QN adaptation. We demonstrate the soundness of our approach on a simple representative example in two ways: (i) on one end, we provide a formal proof of controller performance guarantees, and (ii) on the other end we show the sensitivity over time of software adaptation actions to different (types and intensities of) disturbances.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1145/2737182.2737187

Cites

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

No references could be resolved yet.

Research works printed but not linked: 48

  1. 10.1145/2568088.2568094 · DOI
  2. Patikirikorala T., 2012, ?A systematic survey on the design of self-adaptive software systems using control engineering approaches, SEAMS., 33
  3. Filieri A., 2015, IEEE
  4. J. Hellerstein etal Feedback Control of Computing Systems. 2004. J. Hellerstein et al. Feedback Control of Computing Systems. 2004. · DOI
  5. 10.1109/ASE.2011.6100064 · DOI
  6. 10.1109/LCN.2004.112 · DOI
  7. 10.1007/s00165-011-0207-2 · DOI
  8. Filieri A., 2015, IEEE
  9. 10.1109/71.980028 · DOI
  10. 10.1023/A:1015350520175 · DOI
  11. 10.1145/2568225.2568272 · DOI
  12. 10.1109/MIC.2012.142 · DOI
  13. 10.1109/MCS.2003.1200252 · DOI
  14. Fritzson P., 1998, ECOOP., 67
  15. 10.5555/1051066 · DOI
  16. 10.1145/1243401.1243409 · DOI
  17. 10.1007/978-1-4614-1833-7_1 · DOI
  18. 10.1109/TAC.2004.829632 · DOI
  19. 10.1016/j.jprocont.2013.07.010 · DOI
  20. Aström K., 2006, USA: ISA
  21. 10.1109/FOSE.2007.19 · DOI
  22. Eeckhout L., 2003, ?Quantifying the Impact of Input Data Sets on Program Behavior and its Applications, J. Instruction-Level Parallelism, 5
  23. 10.1145/1065944.1065981 · DOI
  24. 10.1145/1542476.1542481 · DOI
  25. 10.1145/1806596.1806620 · DOI
  26. 10.1145/1941553.1941589 · DOI
  27. 10.1145/1944862.1944880 · DOI
  28. 10.1145/1217935.1217949 · DOI
  29. 10.1007/s11280-007-0030-0 · DOI
  30. 10.1109/TPDS.2006.123 · DOI
  31. 10.1109/CLOUD.2010.55 · DOI
  32. 10.1007/s10586-007-0022-y · DOI
  33. 10.1147/rd.502.0239 · DOI
  34. Karamanolis C., 2005, ?Designing controllable computer systems, HotOS., 9
  35. Maggio M., 2010, ?Controlling software applications via resource allocation within the heartbeats framework, CDC ., 3736
  36. 10.1145/2228360.2228409 · DOI
  37. Dorf R., 2008, Prentice Hall
  38. 10.1145/1496909.1496922 · DOI
  39. Tanelli M., 2008, ?LPV model identification for Power Management of Web service Systems, MSC., 1171
  40. Filieri A., 2012, ?Reliability-driven dynamic binding via feedback control, SEAMS., 43
  41. 10.1109/CSSE.2008.1219 · DOI
  42. 10.1145/1710115.1710123 · DOI
  43. 10.5555/2555854 · DOI
  44. 10.1016/j.jss.2013.07.053 · DOI
  45. 10.1145/2330667.2330686 · DOI
  46. 10.1109/TSE.2011.68 · DOI
  47. 10.1109/SCC.2010.94 · DOI
  48. 10.1145/1958746.1958772 · DOI

Cited by

See all 23

Metadata

Authors
Arcelli, D., Cortellessa, V., Filieri, A., & Leva, A.
Affiliations
  • University of L'Aquila (IT)
  • University of Stuttgart (DE)
  • Politecnico di Milano (IT)
Venue
Proceedings of the 11th International ACM SIGSOFT Conference on Quality of Software Architectures
Publisher
ACM
Published
2015-05-04
Pages
11-20
OpenAlex
W1971674111
Cited by
23
References
0
Citations by year
2025: 3 · 2023: 1 · 2022: 1 · 2021: 3 · 2020: 2 · 2018: 2 · 2017: 5 · 2016: 4 · 2015: 2
FWCI
2.44
Type
conference paper
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • International ACM SIGSOFT Conference on Quality of Software Architectures (QoSA) (publishedVersion)
  • Archivio Istituzionale della Ricerca - Università degli Studi dell Aquila (submittedVersion)
  • Virtual Community of Pathological Anatomy (University of Castilla La Mancha) (submittedVersion)
  • Spiral (Imperial College London) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Software › Advanced Software Engineering Methodologies
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Software › Model-Driven Software Engineering Techniques
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Networks and Communications › Software System Performance and Reliability
Keywords
self-adaptive software, program adaptation, control theory, queueing networks, Modelica, non-functional requirements, performance requirements, queue length control, disturbance sensitivity, software architecture modeling

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Control Theory for Model-based Performance-driven Software Adaptation. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1145/2737182.2737187
The paper
Arcelli, D., Cortellessa, V., Filieri, A., & Leva, A. (2015). Control Theory for Model-based Performance-driven Software Adaptation. Proceedings of the 11th International ACM SIGSOFT Conference on Quality of Software Architectures. https://doi.org/10.1145/2737182.2737187