The DOI matches its Crossref record; 63 of the 63 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Large-scale cluster management at Google with Borg
Open accessAbstract
Google's Borg system is a cluster manager that runs hundreds of thousands of jobs, from many thousands of different applications, across a number of clusters each with up to tens of thousands of machines.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
The source backs part of the claim, not all of it — or backs it for a different population, condition or comparison.
In the citing paper
“Borg [25], the Kubernetes lineage [52], Tetris [26], Hawk [27], and Sparrow [28] pack stateless jobs; Gaia [22] optimizes geo-distributed training .”
From Janus: Joint Prefill/Decode Disaggregation with KV-Cache-Aware Multi-Cloud Routing for Edge-Adjacent LLM Serving (2026) · cites this paper as [25]
Experimental — accuracy not yet measuredThe cited source says what the claim attributes to it.
In the citing paper
“Google's Borg [27] and Kubernetes [28] handle container orchestration with resource limits and quotas.”
From AgentRM: An OS-Inspired Resource Manager for LLM Agent Systems (2026) · cites this paper as [27]
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
MapReduce: simplified data processing on large clusters
Dean, J., & Ghemawat, S. (2008) · Communications of the ACM · doi:10.1145/1327452.1327492 · Cited by 18,476
Malewicz, G. G., Austern, M. H., Bik, A. J. C., Dehnert, J. C., Horn, I., Leiser, N., & Czajkowski, G. (2010) · ACM SIGMOD International Conference on Management of Data (SIGMOD) · doi:10.1145/1807167.1807184 · Cited by 3,518
Chang, F. W., Dean, J., Ghemawat, S., Hsieh, W. C.-Y., Wallach, D. A., Burrows, M., Chandra, T., Fikes, A., & Gruber, R. E. (2008) · ACM Transactions on Computer Systems · doi:10.1145/1365815.1365816 · Cited by 3,461
Lamport, L. (1998) · ACM Transactions on Computer Systems · doi:10.1145/279227.279229 · Cited by 2,748
Ghemawat, S., Gobioff, H., & Leung, S.-T. A. (2003) · ACM SIGOPS Operating Systems Review · doi:10.1145/1165389.945450 · Cited by 2,665
Condor-a hunter of idle workstations
Litzkow, M., Livny, M., & Mutka, M. W. (2003) · Proceedings of the ... International Conference on Distributed Computing Systems/Proceedings of the International Conference on Distributed Computing Systems · doi:10.1109/dcs.1988.12507 · Cited by 2,243
Dean, J., & Barroso, L. A. (2013) · Communications of the ACM · doi:10.1145/2408776.2408794 · Cited by 1,852
Apache Hadoop YARN: yet another resource negotiator
Vavilapalli, V. K., Murthy, A. C., Douglas, C., Agarwal, S., Konar, M., Evans, R., Graves, T., Lowe, J., Shah, H., Seth, S., et al. (2013) · Proceedings of the 4th annual Symposium on Cloud Computing · doi:10.1145/2523616.2523633 · Cited by 1,848
The Datacenter as a Computer: An Introduction to the Design of Warehouse-Scale Machines
Barroso, L. A., & Hölzle, U. (2009) · Synthesis lectures on computer architecture · doi:10.2200/s00193ed1v01y200905cac006 · Cited by 1,711
(2011) · doi:10.5555/1972457.1972488 · Cited by 1,619
Research works printed but not linked: 26
- Adaptive Computing Enterprises Inc., 2011, Maui Scheduler Administrator's Guide, 3.2 edition
- Aurora Apache, 2014, http://aurora.incubator.apache.org/
- Amazon Web AWS., 2014, http://aws.amazon.com/ec2/instance-types/
- Baker J., 2011, Proc. Conference on Innovative Data Systems Research (CIDR), 223
- Bokharouss I., 2008, Eindhoven Univ. of Technology
- Boutin E., 2014, Proc. USENIX Symp. on Operating Systems Design and Implementation (OSDI)
- Burrows M., 2006, Proc. USENIX Symp. on Operating Systems Design and Implementation (OSDI), 335
- CFS, 2013, http://lwn.net/Articles/531853
- Project Docker, 2014, https://www.docker.io/
- 2014, http://www.elasticsearch.org
- 2014, http://www.fluentd.org/
- Ghodsi A., 2011, Proc. USENIX Symp. on Networked Systems Design and Implementation (NSDI), 323
- Engine Google App, 2014, http://cloud.google.com/AppEngine
- Google Container, 2015, https://cloud.google.com/container-engine/
- Project Apache Hadoop, 2009, http://hadoop.apache.org/
- Hamilton J., 2007, Proc. Large Installation System Administration Conf. (LISA), 231
- Hindman B., 2011, Proc. USENIX Symp. on Networked Systems Design and Implementation (NSDI)
- Iqbal S., 2005, Dell Power Solutions
- 10.5555/646382.689682 · DOI
- 2014, Aug.
- 10.5555/1413370.1413424 · DOI
- Project Apache Spark, 2014, http://spark.apache.org/
- Turner P., 2010, Proc. Linux Symposium, 245
- Wilkes J., 2011, Nov.
- Zhai Y., 2014, Proc. USENIX Annual Technical Conf. (USENIX ATC), 211
- Zhang Q., 2011, Proc. Int'l Workshop on Large-Scale Distributed Systems and Middleware (LADIS)
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Items 1,001–1,003 of 1,003
AgentRM: An OS-Inspired Resource Manager for LLM Agent Systems
She, J. (2026) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2603.13110
“Google’s Borg [27] and Kubernetes [28] handle container orchestration with resource limits and quotas.”
Aruna, K. B., Kaliraj, V., Sudha, I., & Sureka, V. (2026) · EAI Endorsed Transactions on Internet of Things · doi:10.4108/eetiot.13349
(2017) · Networked Systems Design and Implementation · Cited by 329
Metadata
- Authors
- Verma, A., Pedrosa, L., Korupolu, M., Oppenheimer, D., Tune, E., & Wilkes, J.
- Affiliations
- Google (United States) (US)
- Venue
- Proceedings of the Tenth European Conference on Computer Systems
- Publisher
- ACM
- Published
- 2015-04-17
- Pages
- 1-17
- OpenAlex
- W2141992894
- Semantic Scholar
- 3a043714354fe498752b45e4cf429dbae0fb2558
- Cited by
- 1,468
- References
- 63
- Citations by year
- 2026: 154 · 2025: 139 · 2024: 110 · 2023: 115 · 2022: 114 · 2021: 156 · 2020: 129 · 2019: 152 · 2018: 141 · 2017: 114 · 2016: 119 · 2015: 25
- FWCI
- 115.57
- Type
- conference paper
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
- doi.org
- Locations
- European Conference on Computer Systems (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Information Systems › Cloud Computing and Resource Management
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Networks and Communications › Distributed and Parallel Computing Systems
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Networks and Communications › Distributed systems and fault tolerance
- Keywords
- cluster management, job scheduling, large-scale distributed systems, Google, cluster computing, resource management
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
