Cited by 16Quantum Computing Algorithms and ArchitectureQuantum Information and CryptographyQuantum many-body systems

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

An introduction into fault-tolerant quantum computing

Paler, Alexandru, Devitt, Simon J.·2015·Proceedings of the 52nd Annual Design Automation Conference

Abstract

We provide a basic introduction of the core ideas and theory surrounding fault-tolerant quantum computation. Quantum fault-tolerance essentially refers to avoiding the uncontrollable cascade of errors caused by the interaction of quantum-bits. The presented concepts underlay the theoretical framework of large-scale quantum computation and are the driving force for many recent experimental efforts to construct small to medium sized arrays of controllable quantum bits. We examine the basic principles of redundant quantum encoding, required to protect quantum bits from errors generated from both imprecise control and environmental interactions. The novelty of this work consists in the presentation of fault-tolerance principles from a classical distributed computing perspective, as this enables a more straightforward introduction without sacrificing generality. The practicality of fault-tolerant quantum computing is analysed after introducing a metric of scalability and discussing the factors influencing it.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1145/2744769.2747911

Cites

2 of 2 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

Research works printed but not linked: 11

  1. 10.5555/1972495 · DOI
  2. 10.1088/0034-4885/76/7/076001 · DOI
  3. 10.1038/ncomms3524 · DOI
  4. 10.1038/nature14270 · DOI
  5. 10.1103/PhysRevA.86.032324 · DOI · Paper page
  6. 10.5555/2685179.2685184 · DOI
  7. Ladd T. D., 2010, Quantum Computers. Nature (London), 464:45--53
  8. 10.1017/CBO9780511976667 · DOI · Paper page
  9. 10.5555/2616606.2616757 · DOI
  10. 10.1103/PhysRevA.52.R2493 · DOI · Paper page
  11. Rodney Van Meter. Quantum Networking. John Wiley & Sons 2014. Rodney Van Meter. Quantum Networking. John Wiley & Sons 2014. · DOI

Cited by

Sorted by citations

See all 16

Metadata

Authors
Paler, A., & Devitt, S. J.
Affiliations
  • University of Passau (DE)
  • Ochanomizu University (JP)
Venue
Proceedings of the 52nd Annual Design Automation Conference
Publisher
ACM
Published
2015-06-07
Pages
1-6
ISSN
0738-100X (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W1967819975
Cited by
16
References
2
Citations by year
2025: 4 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 3 · 2021: 2 · 2020: 1 · 2018: 3 · 2017: 1
FWCI
0.75
Type
conference paper
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
ACM/IEEE Design Automation Conference (DAC) (publishedVersion)
Funders
Japan Society for the Promotion of Science (25280034)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Quantum Computing Algorithms and Architecture
  • Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics › Quantum Information and Cryptography
  • Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics › Quantum many-body systems
Keywords
fault-tolerant quantum computing, quantum error correction, environmental decoherence, scalability metrics

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review