The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
A new framework for itemset generation
Open accessAbstract
The problem of finding association rules in a large database of sales transactions has been widely studied in the literature, We discuss some of the weaknesses of the large itemset method for association rule generation.A different method for evaluating and finding itemsets referred to as otrongIyl collective itemsets is proposed.The concepts of "support" of an itemset and correlation of the items within an itemset are related, though not quite the same.This criterion stresses the importance of the actual correlation of the items with one another rather than the absolute support, Previously proposed methods to provide correlated itemsets are not necessarily applicable to very large databases, We provide an algorithm which provides very good computational efficiency, while maintaining statistical robuetneas, The fact that this algorithm relies on relative measures rather than absolute measures such as support also implies that the method can be applied to find association rules in datasets in which items may appear in a sizeable percentage of the transactions (dense datasets), datasets in which the items have varying density, or even negative association rules,
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Mining association rules between sets of items in large databases
Agrawal, R., Imieliński, T., & Swami, A. (1993) · Proceedings of the 1993 ACM SIGMOD international conference on Management of data · doi:10.1145/170035.170072 · Cited by 14,907
Cited by
Data mining: concepts and techniques
(2012) · Choice Reviews Online · doi:10.5860/choice.49-3305 · Cited by 28,531
Frequent pattern mining: current status and future directions
Han, J., Cheng, H., Xin, D., & Yan, X. (2007) · Data Mining and Knowledge Discovery · doi:10.1007/s10618-006-0059-1 · Cited by 1,380
Metadata
- Authors
- Aggarwal, C. C., & Yu, P. S.
- Venue
- Proceedings of the seventeenth ACM SIGACT-SIGMOD-SIGART symposium on Principles of database systems
- Publisher
- ACM
- Published
- 1998-05
- Pages
- 18-24
- OpenAlex
- W1990951910
- Cited by
- 239
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 5.18
- Type
- conference paper
- Language
- en
- Open access
- gold
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: A new framework for itemset generation. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1145/275487.275490
- The paper
- Aggarwal, C. C., & Yu, P. S. (1998). A new framework for itemset generation. Proceedings of the seventeenth ACM SIGACT-SIGMOD-SIGART symposium on Principles of database systems. https://doi.org/10.1145/275487.275490
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.