The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Integrating association rule mining with relational database systems: alternatives and implications
Open accessAbstract
Data mining on large data warehouses is becoming increasingly important. In support of this trend, we consider a spectrum of architectural alternatives for coupling mining with database systems. These alternatives include: loose-coupling through a SQL cursor interface; encapsulation of a mining algorithm in a stored procedure; caching the data to a file system on-the-fly and mining; tight-coupling using primarily user-defined functions; and SQL implementations for processing in the DBMS. We comprehensively study the option of expressing the mining algorithm in the form of SQL queries using Association rule mining as a case in point. We consider four options in SQL-92 and six options in SQL enhanced with object-relational extensions (SQL-OR). Our evaluation of the different architectural alternatives shows that from a performance perspective, the Cache-Mine option is superior, although the performance of the SQL-OR option is within a factor of two. Both the Cache-Mine and the SQL-OR approaches incur a higher storage penalty than the loose-coupling approach which performance-wise is a factor of 3 to 4 worse than Cache-Mine. The SQL-92 implementations were too slow to qualify as a competitive option. We also compare these alternatives on the basis of qualitative factors like automatic parallelization, development ease, portability and inter-operability.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Mining association rules between sets of items in large databases
Agrawal, R., Imieliński, T., & Swami, A. (1993) · Proceedings of the 1993 ACM SIGMOD international conference on Management of data · doi:10.1145/170035.170072 · Cited by 14,907
Self-citationSet-oriented mining for association rules in relational databases
Houtsma, M., & Swami, A. (2002) · Proceedings of the Eleventh International Conference on Data Engineering · doi:10.1109/icde.1995.380413 · Cited by 263
Cited by
Data mining: concepts and techniques
(2012) · Choice Reviews Online · doi:10.5860/choice.49-3305 · Cited by 28,531
Mining frequent patterns without candidate generation
Han, J., Pei, J., & Yin, Y. (2000) · ACM SIGMOD Record · doi:10.1145/335191.335372 · Cited by 6,402
Frequent pattern mining: current status and future directions
Han, J., Cheng, H., Xin, D., & Yan, X. (2007) · Data Mining and Knowledge Discovery · doi:10.1007/s10618-006-0059-1 · Cited by 1,380
A Survey of Methods for Scaling Up Inductive Algorithms
Provost, F., & Kolluri, V. (1999) · Data Mining and Knowledge Discovery · doi:10.1023/a:1009876119989 · Cited by 277
Constrained frequent pattern mining: a pattern-growth view
Pei, J., & Han, J. (2002) · ACM SIGKDD Explorations Newsletter · doi:10.1145/568574.568580 · Cited by 133
Metadata
- Authors
- Sarawagi, S., Thomas, S., & Agrawal, R.
- Venue
- Proceedings of the 1998 ACM SIGMOD international conference on Management of data
- Publisher
- ACM
- Published
- 1998-06
- Pages
- 343-354
- ISSN
- 0730-8078 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2064803206
- Cited by
- 306
- References
- 2
- FWCI
- 21.82
- Type
- conference paper
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Integrating association rule mining with relational database systems: alternatives and implications. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1145/276304.276335
- The paper
- Sarawagi, S., Thomas, S., & Agrawal, R. (1998). Integrating association rule mining with relational database systems: alternatives and implications. Proceedings of the 1998 ACM SIGMOD international conference on Management of data. https://doi.org/10.1145/276304.276335
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.