Cited by 29Advanced Text Analysis TechniquesInformation Retrieval and Search BehaviorText and Document Classification Technologies

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Automatic subject indexing using an associative neural network

Open access
Chung, Yi-Ming, Pottenger, William M., Schatz, Bruce R.·1998·Proceedings of the third ACM conference on Digital libraries - DL '98

Abstract

The global growth in popularity of the World Wide Web has been enabled in part by the availability of browser based search tools which in turn have led to an increased demand for indexing techniques and technologies.As the amount of globally accessible information in community repositories grows, it is no longer cost-effective for such repositories to be indexed by professional indexers who have been trained to be consistent in subject assignment from controlled vocabulary lists.The era of amateur indexers is thus upon us, and the information infrastructure needs to provide support for such indexing if search of the Net is to produce useful results.In this paper, we propose the ConceptAssigner, an automatic subject indexing system based on a variant of the Hopfield network [ 131.In the application discussed herein, a collection of documents is used to automatically create a subset of a thesaurus termed a Concept Space [4J.To automatically index an individual document, concepts extracted from the given document become the input pattern to a Concept Space represented as a Hopfield network.The Hopfield net parallel spreading activation process produces another set of concepts that are strongly related to the concepts of the input document.Such concepts are suitable for use in an interactive indexing environment.A prototype of our automatic subject indexing system has been implemented as part of the Interspace, a semantic indexing and retrieval environment which supports statisticallybased semantic indexing in a persistent object environment.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1145/276675.276682

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Research works printed but not linked: 20

  1. M. J. Bates. Subject access in online catalogs: A design model. Journal of the Americun Societyfor lnformution Science, 37:357-376, 1986.
  2. H. Chen and K. J. Lynch. Automatic construc- tion of networks of concepts characterizing document databases. IEEE Trunsuctions on Systems. Mun and Cybernetics, 22(5):885-902, September/October 1992.
  3. H. Chen. D. T. Ng, J. Martinez, and B. R. Schatz. A Concept Space Approach to Addressing the Vocabu- lary Problem in Scientific Information Retrieval: An Experiment on the Worm Community System. Jaw- nul of the American Socieq ,fnr Information Scierw. 48( 1): 17-3 1, 1997.
  4. J. Dalton and A. Deshmane. Artificial neural networks. IEEE Potentials, 10(2):33-36, April 1991.
  5. J. F. Farrow. A cognitive process model of document indexing. Journal of Documentation, 47(2):149-166, June 1991.
  6. IO. G. W. Furnas, T. K. Landaucr, L. M. Gomcz, and S. T. Dumais. The Vocabulary Problem in Human- System Communication. Communications oj'the ACM, 30( I 1):964-97 1, November 1987.
  7. P. Hayes and G. Koerner. Intelligent text technolo- gies and their successful use by the information indus- try. In Proceedings of National Online Meeting. 14th Nutional Online Meeting, pages 189-196, New York, N.Y.. 1993.
  8. P. Hayes and P. M. Weinstein. CONSTRU/TIS: A sys- tem for content-based indexing of a database of news stories. In Innovative Applications of Artificial Intelli- gence 2, pages 49-64, The AAAI Press/The MIT Press, Cambridge, Mass., 199 I.
  9. S. M. Humphrey. MedIndEx: the Medical Indexing Ex- pert System. In Expert systems in libraries, pages 192- 22 I, Rao Aluri and Donald E. Riggs, editors; Norwood, NL: Ablex, 1990.
  10. K. Knight. Connectionist ideas and algorithms. Cot?- munications of the ACM, 33( I 1):59-74, November 1990.
  11. IX. T. Kohoncn. Selj-Organization and Associative Mem ory. Tllird Edition. Springer-Vcrlag, Berlin Heidelberg, 19x9.
  12. R. R. Larson. Experiments in Automatic Library of' Congress Classificaiton. Journal of the American So- ciet\l for Information Science, 43(2): 130-l 48, March 1992.
  13. M. E. Masson. Cognitive processes in skimming sto- ries. Journal of Experimental Psychologp: Learning, Memov and Cognition, 8:400-417, 1982.
  14. C. Meadow. Text Information Retrieval Systems. Aca- demic Press Inc., San Diego, California, 1992.
  15. B Schatz, W. Mischo, T. Cole, J. Hardin, A. Bishop, and H. Chen. Federating Diverse Collections of Scientific Literature. IEEE Computer, 29:28-36, May 1996.
  16. B. R. Schatz. Building the Interspace: The Illinois Digital Library Project. Communications ofthe ACM, 38(4):62-63, April 1995.
  17. B. R. Schatz. Information retrieval in digital libraries: Bringing search to the net. Science, 275(5298):327- 334, Jan. 1997.
  18. 2X. B. R. Schatz and H. Chen. Building Large-Scale Digital Libraries. IEEE Computer, 29(5):22-26, 1996.
  19. D. W. Tank and J. J. Hopficld. Collective computation in neuronlikc circuits. Scienti$c American, 257(6): 104- I 14, December 1987.
  20. D. Tarr and H. Borko. Factors influencing intcr- indexing consistency. In Proceeding of the American Sociep,for Irlftirmation Science 37th Annual Meeting, pages 50-55, 1974.

Cited by

See all 29

Metadata

Authors
Chung, Y.-M., Pottenger, W. M., & Schatz, B. R.
Affiliations
University of Illinois Urbana-Champaign (US)
Venue
Proceedings of the third ACM conference on Digital libraries - DL '98
Publisher
ACM Press
Published
1998
Pages
59-68
OpenAlex
W2096276775
Cited by
29
References
1
Citations by year
2022: 1 · 2018: 1 · 2017: 1 · 2015: 1
FWCI
1.90
Type
conference paper
Language
en
Open access
Locations
ACM international conference on Digital libraries (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • National Science Foundation
  • National Aeronautics and Space Administration
  • University of Arizona
  • Defense Advanced Research Projects Agency
  • University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Advanced Text Analysis Techniques
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Information Systems › Information Retrieval and Search Behavior
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Text and Document Classification Technologies
Keywords
automatic subject indexing, associative neural networks, Hopfield neural network, conceptual space, thesauri, spreading activation, semantic indexing, document indexing, controlled vocabulary, interspace

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review