The DOI matches its Crossref record; 3 of the 3 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Proceedings of the 24th ACM International on Conference on Information and Knowledge Management
Abstract
The publication date is one day earlier then the EST date to provide the proceedings to attendees in Australian on the first day of the conference We are delighted to welcome you to the 24th ACM International Conference on Information and Knowledge Management (CIKM 2015), held in Melbourne from October 19--23, 2015. CIKM is now well-established as a leading venue for bringing together researchers from across the Database, Information Retrieval, and Knowledge Management communities. Continuing the pattern of previous years, we received a large number of high-quality submissions in all three tracks, in both full- and short-paper categories. As a result, we are confident that CIKM 2015 has succeeded in creating an outstanding technical program including research paper presentations; short-paper presentations during the poster session; plenary talks; and an engaging Industry Track arranged by the Industry Track Chairs. In total, we received 646 fullpaper (10-page) submissions and 276 short-paper (4-page) submissions, which were reviewed and discussed by 88 area chairs, 471 program committee members, and a further 145 expert external reviewers. We accepted 165 full papers (26%) and 69 short papers (25%). The acceptance statistics per track were as follows: Databases, 35/129 full papers and 6/37 short papers; Information Retrieval, 43/171 full papers and 27/101 short papers; and Knowledge Management, 87/346 papers and 36/138 short papers. Two of the Knowledge Management short papers were withdrawn by their authors prior to the proceedings being finalized. Our work was greatly eased by the support provided by the Microsoft CMT service, and we thank the CMT team for their assistance.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Distributed Representations of Words and Phrases and their Compositionality
Mikolov, T., Sutskever, I., Chen, K., Corrado, G., & Dean, J. (2013) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.1310.4546 · Cited by 24,533
SQuAD: 100,000+ Questions for Machine Comprehension of Text
Rajpurkar, P., Zhang, J., Lopyrev, K., & Liang, P. (2016) · Proceedings of the 2016 Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing · doi:10.18653/v1/d16-1264 · Cited by 6,208
A computer-aided environment for generating multiple-choice test items
MITKOV, R., AN HA, L., & KARAMANIS, N. (2006) · Natural Language Engineering · doi:10.1017/s1351324906004177 · Cited by 229
Cited by
Survey of Hallucination in Natural Language Generation
Ji, Z., Lee, N., Frieske, R., Yu, T., Su, D., Xu, Y., Ishii, E., Bang, Y. J., Madotto, A., & Fung, P. (2023) · ACM Computing Surveys · doi:10.1145/3571730 · Cited by 5,025
Graph embedding techniques, applications, and performance: A survey
Goyal, P., & Ferrara, E. (2018) · Knowledge-Based Systems · doi:10.1016/j.knosys.2018.03.022 · Cited by 1,801
A review: Knowledge reasoning over knowledge graph
Chen, X., Jia, S., & Xiang, Y. (2020) · Expert Systems with Applications · doi:10.1016/j.eswa.2019.112948 · Cited by 1,035
An overview of online fake news: Characterization, detection, and discussion
Zhang, X., & Ghorbani, A. A. (2020) · Information Processing & Management · doi:10.1016/j.ipm.2019.03.004 · Cited by 997
A survey on wearable sensor modality centred human activity recognition in health care
Wang, Y., Cang, S., & Yu, H. (2019) · Expert Systems with Applications · doi:10.1016/j.eswa.2019.04.057 · Cited by 409
Query expansion techniques for information retrieval: a survey
Azad, H. K., & Deepak, A. (2019) · Information Processing & Management · doi:10.1016/j.ipm.2019.05.009 · Cited by 313
Named Entity Recognition and Relation Extraction: State-of-the-Art
Nasar, Z., Jaffry, S. W., & Malik, M. K. (2022) · ACM Computing Surveys · doi:10.1145/3445965 · Cited by 245
Lwakatare, L. E., Raj, A., Crnkovic, I., Bosch, J., & Olsson, H. H. (2020) · Information and Software Technology · doi:10.1016/j.infsof.2020.106368 · Cited by 241
Dense Text Retrieval Based on Pretrained Language Models: A Survey
Zhao, W. X., Liu, J., Ren, R., & Wen, J.-R. (2024) · ACM Transactions on Information Systems · doi:10.1145/3637870 · Cited by 211
Progress in context-aware recommender systems — An overview
Raza, S., & Ding, C. (2019) · Computer Science Review · doi:10.1016/j.cosrev.2019.01.001 · Cited by 151
A/B testing: A systematic literature review
Quin, F., Weyns, D., Galster, M., & Silva, C. C. (2024) · Journal of Systems and Software · doi:10.1016/j.jss.2024.112011 · Cited by 83
FAST2: An intelligent assistant for finding relevant papers
Yu, Z., & Menzies, T. (2019) · Expert Systems with Applications · doi:10.1016/j.eswa.2018.11.021 · Cited by 80
Combining FastText and Glove Word Embedding for Offensive and Hate speech Text Detection
Badri, N., Kboubi, F., & Chaibi, A. H. (2022) · Procedia Computer Science · doi:10.1016/j.procs.2022.09.132 · Cited by 65
MCN: A comprehensive corpus for medical concept normalization
Luo, Y.-F., Sun, W., & Rumshisky, A. (2019) · Journal of Biomedical Informatics · doi:10.1016/j.jbi.2019.103132 · Cited by 62
How search engines disseminate information about COVID-19 and why they should do better
Makhortykh, M., Urman, A., & Ulloa, R. (2020) · Harvard Kennedy School Misinformation Review · doi:10.37016/mr-2020-017 · Cited by 54
Improving k-anonymity based privacy preservation for collaborative filtering
Wei, R., Tian, H., & Shen, H. (2018) · Computers & Electrical Engineering · doi:10.1016/j.compeleceng.2018.02.017 · Cited by 44
Horizontal Federated Recommender System: A Survey
Wang, L., Zhou, H., Bao, Y., Yan, X., Shen, G., & Kong, X. (2024) · ACM Computing Surveys · doi:10.1145/3656165 · Cited by 37
Deep Learning Models for Serendipity Recommendations: A Survey and New Perspectives
Fu, Z., Niu, X., & Maher, M. L. (2024) · ACM Computing Surveys · doi:10.1145/3605145 · Cited by 30
A technical survey on statistical modelling and design methods for crowdsourcing quality control
Jin, Y., Carman, M., Zhu, Y., & Xiang, Y. (2020) · Artificial Intelligence · doi:10.1016/j.artint.2020.103351 · Cited by 28
Kim, J., Kim, J., & Kim, J. (2023) · Journal of Information Science · doi:10.1177/01655515211018171 · Cited by 9
(2022) · doi:10.1145/3488560.3498456 · Cited by 3
Metadata
- Publisher
- ACM
- Published
- 2015-10-17
- OpenAlex
- W2918008835
- Cited by
- 842
- References
- 3
- Type
- paratext
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
