Cited by 358Advanced Neural Network ApplicationsVideo Surveillance and Tracking MethodsMobile and Web Applications

Glimpse: Continuous, Real-Time Object Recognition on Mobile Devices

Open access
Chen, Tiffany Yu-Han, Ravindranath, Lenin, Deng, Shuo, Bahl, Paramvir, Balakrishnan, Hari·2015·Proceedings of the 13th ACM Conference on Embedded Networked Sensor Systems

Abstract

Glimpse is a continuous, real-time object recognition system for camera-equipped mobile devices. Glimpse captures full-motion video, locates objects of interest, recognizes and labels them, and tracks them from frame to frame for the user. Because the algorithms for object recognition entail significant computation, Glimpse runs them on server machines. When the latency between the server and mobile device is higher than a frame-time, this approach lowers object recognition accuracy. To regain accuracy, Glimpse uses an active cache of video frames on the mobile device. A subset of the frames in the active cache are used to track objects on the mobile, using (stale) hints about objects that arrive from the server from time to time. To reduce network bandwidth usage, Glimpse computes trigger frames to send to the server for recognizing and labeling. Experiments with Android smartphones and Google Glass over Verizon, AT&T, and a campus Wi-Fi network show that with hardware face detection support (available on many mobile devices), Glimpse achieves precision between 96.4% to 99.8% for continuous face recognition, which improves over a scheme performing hardware face detection and server-side recognition without Glimpse's techniques by between 1.8-2.5×. The improvement in precision for face recognition without hardware detection is between 1.6-5.5×. For road sign recognition, which does not have a hardware detector, Glimpse achieves precision between 75% and 80%; without Glimpse, continuous detection is non-functional (0.2%-1.9% precision).

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1145/2809695.2809711

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 59 · Cited by 358

Authors
Chen, T. Y.-H., Ravindranath, L., Deng, S., Bahl, P., & Balakrishnan, H.
Affiliations
  • Massachusetts Institute of Technology (US)
  • Microsoft (United States) (US)
Venue
Proceedings of the 13th ACM Conference on Embedded Networked Sensor Systems
Publisher
ACM
Published
2015-11
Pages
155-168
OpenAlex
W2029016069
Cited by
358
References
59
Citations by year
2026: 15 · 2025: 25 · 2024: 45 · 2023: 39 · 2022: 46 · 2021: 42 · 2020: 38 · 2019: 32 · 2018: 48 · 2017: 23 · 2016: 5
FWCI
10.39
Type
conference paper
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • ACM Conference on Embedded Networked Sensor Systems (SenSys) (publishedVersion)
  • DSpace@MIT (Massachusetts Institute of Technology) (submittedVersion, cc-by-nc-sa)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition › Advanced Neural Network Applications
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition › Video Surveillance and Tracking Methods
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Information Systems › Mobile and Web Applications
Keywords
object recognition, mobile devices, object tracking, network latency, face detection, traffic sign recognition, network bandwidth reduction, real-time video processing, Google Glass, Android smartphones

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review