Sunlight: Fine-grained Targeting Detection at Scale with Statistical Confidence
Abstract
We present Sunlight, a system that detects the causes of targeting phenomena on the web -- such as personalized advertisements, recommendations, or content -- at large scale and with solid statistical confidence. Today's web is growing increasingly complex and impenetrable as myriad of services collect, analyze, use, and exchange users' personal information. No one can tell who has what data, for what purposes they are using it, and how those uses affect the users. The few studies that exist reveal problematic effects -- such as discriminatory pricing and advertising -- but they are either too small-scale to generalize or lack formal assessments of confidence in the results, making them difficult to trust or interpret. Sunlight brings a principled and scalable methodology to personal data measurements by adapting well-established methods from statistics for the specific problem of targeting detection. Our methodology formally separates different operations into four key phases: scalable hypothesis generation, interpretable hypothesis formation, statistical significance testing, and multiple testing correction. Each phase bears instantiations from multiple mechanisms from statistics, each making different assumptions and tradeoffs. Sunlight offers a modular design that allows exploration of this vast design space. We explore a portion of this space, thoroughly evaluating the tradeoffs both analytically and experimentally. Our exploration reveals subtle tensions between scalabi…
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Certain users on advertising platforms are more valuable to advertisers than others.
“For example, it is well-known that certain users on advertising platforms are more valuable to advertisers than others [48,55,65].”
From Discrimination through Optimization (2019) · cites this paper as [55]
Cites
Ng, A. Y. (2004) · Twenty-first international conference on Machine learning - ICML '04 · doi:10.1145/1015330.1015435 · Cited by 1,572 · see citing works
Measuring price discrimination and steering on e-commerce web sites
Hannak, A., Soeller, G., Lazer, D., Mislove, A., & Wilson, C. (2014) · Proceedings of the 2014 Conference on Internet Measurement Conference · doi:10.1145/2663716.2663744 · Cited by 368 · cited 2× · see citing works
“1In this paper, the term trustworthy refers strictly to the level of confidence (in a statistical sense) one can have in the results of an investigation assuming the non-malicious service model in §3.3.”
BackgroundInfluentialCrowd-assisted search for price discrimination in e-commerce: first results
Mikians, J., Gyarmati, L., Erramilli, V., & Laoutaris, N. (2013) · Proceedings of the ninth ACM conference on Emerging networking experiments and technologies · doi:10.1145/2535372.2535415 · Cited by 82 · see citing works
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Datta, A., Sen, S., & Zick, Y. (2016) · 2016 IEEE Symposium on Security and Privacy (SP) · doi:10.1109/sp.2016.42 · Cited by 728 · see citing works
Discrimination through Optimization
Ali, M., Sapiezynski, P., Bogen, M., Korolova, A., Mislove, A., & Rieke, A. (2019) · Proceedings of the ACM on Human-Computer Interaction · doi:10.1145/3359301 · Cited by 268 · see citing works
“For example, much attention has been dedicated to shedding light on the factors that in uence the targeting of a particular ad on the web [52, 53, 61, 78] and on speci c services [19, 77].”
BackgroundFairTest: Discovering Unwarranted Associations in Data-Driven Applications
Tramèr, F., Atlidakis, V., Geambasu, R., Hsu, D., Hubaux, J.-P., Humbert, M., Juels, A., & Lin, H. (2015) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.1510.02377 · Cited by 171 · see citing works
Self-citationFairTest: Discovering Unwarranted Associations in Data-Driven Applications
Tramer, F., Atlidakis, V., Geambasu, R., Hsu, D., Hubaux, J.-P., Humbert, M., Juels, A., & Lin, H. (2017) · 2017 IEEE European Symposium on Security and Privacy (EuroS&P) · doi:10.1109/eurosp.2017.29 · Cited by 171 · see citing works
Self-citationDiscrimination through optimization: How Facebook's ad delivery can lead to skewed outcomes
Ali, M., Sapiezynski, P., Bogen, M., Korolova, A., Mislove, A., & Rieke, A. (2019) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.1904.02095 · Cited by 72 · see citing works
Folk Models of Online Behavioral Advertising
Yao, Y., Lo Re, D., & Wang, Y. (2017) · Proceedings of the 2017 ACM Conference on Computer Supported Cooperative Work and Social Computing · doi:10.1145/2998181.2998316 · Cited by 69 · see citing works
Worst Practices for Designing Production Information Access Systems
Diaz, F. (2016) · ACM SIGIR Forum · doi:10.1145/2964797.2964799 · Cited by 15 · see citing works
- Authors
- Lecuyer, M., Spahn, R., Spiliopolous, Y., Chaintreau, A., Geambasu, R., & Hsu, D.
- Affiliations
- Columbia University, New York, NY, USA
- Columbia University (US)
- Venue
- Proceedings of the 22nd ACM SIGSAC Conference on Computer and Communications Security
- Publisher
- ACM
- Published
- 2015-10-12
- Pages
- 554-566
- ISSN
- 1543-7221 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2045645172
- Cited by
- 48
- References
- 3
- Citations by year
- 2025: 3 · 2024: 1 · 2023: 1 · 2022: 1 · 2021: 3 · 2020: 3 · 2019: 10 · 2018: 9 · 2017: 12 · 2016: 5
- FWCI
- 31.57
- Type
- conference paper
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- ACM SIGSAC Conference on Computer and Communications Security (CCS) (publishedVersion)
- Funders
- National Science Foundation (CNS-1514437, CNS-1351089, 1254035)
- Microsoft Research (Microsoft Faculty Fellowship)
- Yahoo (ACE Award)
- Google (Google Research Award)
- Defense Advanced Research Projects Agency (FA8650-11-C-7190)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Privacy, Security, and Data Protection
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Privacy-Preserving Technologies in Data
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Information Systems › Web Data Mining and Analysis
- Keywords
- personalized advertising, web personalization, statistical significance testing, multiple testing correction, hypothesis generation, privacy, price discrimination
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review