Cited by 48Privacy, Security, and Data ProtectionPrivacy-Preserving Technologies in DataWeb Data Mining and Analysis

Sunlight: Fine-grained Targeting Detection at Scale with Statistical Confidence

Lecuyer, Mathias, Spahn, Riley, Spiliopolous, Yannis, Chaintreau, Augustin, Geambasu, Roxana, Hsu, Daniel·2015·Proceedings of the 22nd ACM SIGSAC Conference on Computer and Communications Security

Abstract

We present Sunlight, a system that detects the causes of targeting phenomena on the web -- such as personalized advertisements, recommendations, or content -- at large scale and with solid statistical confidence. Today's web is growing increasingly complex and impenetrable as myriad of services collect, analyze, use, and exchange users' personal information. No one can tell who has what data, for what purposes they are using it, and how those uses affect the users. The few studies that exist reveal problematic effects -- such as discriminatory pricing and advertising -- but they are either too small-scale to generalize or lack formal assessments of confidence in the results, making them difficult to trust or interpret. Sunlight brings a principled and scalable methodology to personal data measurements by adapting well-established methods from statistics for the specific problem of targeting detection. Our methodology formally separates different operations into four key phases: scalable hypothesis generation, interpretable hypothesis formation, statistical significance testing, and multiple testing correction. Each phase bears instantiations from multiple mechanisms from statistics, each making different assumptions and tradeoffs. Sunlight offers a modular design that allows exploration of this vast design space. We explore a portion of this space, thoroughly evaluating the tradeoffs both analytically and experimentally. Our exploration reveals subtle tensions between scalabi…

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1145/2810103.2813614

Cites

3 of 3 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Certain users on advertising platforms are more valuable to advertisers than others.

    “For example, it is well-known that certain users on advertising platforms are more valuable to advertisers than others [48,55,65].”

    From Discrimination through Optimization (2019) · cites this paper as [55]

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Lecuyer, M., Spahn, R., Spiliopolous, Y., Chaintreau, A., Geambasu, R., & Hsu, D.
Affiliations
  • Columbia University, New York, NY, USA
  • Columbia University (US)
Venue
Proceedings of the 22nd ACM SIGSAC Conference on Computer and Communications Security
Publisher
ACM
Published
2015-10-12
Pages
554-566
ISSN
1543-7221 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2045645172
Cited by
48
References
3
Citations by year
2025: 3 · 2024: 1 · 2023: 1 · 2022: 1 · 2021: 3 · 2020: 3 · 2019: 10 · 2018: 9 · 2017: 12 · 2016: 5
FWCI
31.57
Type
conference paper
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
ACM SIGSAC Conference on Computer and Communications Security (CCS) (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • National Science Foundation (CNS-1514437, CNS-1351089, 1254035)
  • Microsoft Research (Microsoft Faculty Fellowship)
  • Yahoo (ACE Award)
  • Google (Google Research Award)
  • Defense Advanced Research Projects Agency (FA8650-11-C-7190)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Privacy, Security, and Data Protection
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Privacy-Preserving Technologies in Data
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Information Systems › Web Data Mining and Analysis
Keywords
personalized advertising, web personalization, statistical significance testing, multiple testing correction, hypothesis generation, privacy, price discrimination

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review