The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Exploring the similarity space
Open accessAbstract
Ranked queries are used to locate relevant documents in text databases. In a ranked query a list of terms is specified, then the documents that most closely match the query are returned---in decreasing order of similarity---as answers. Crucial to the efficacy of ranked querying is the use of a similarity heuristic, a mechanism that assigns a numeric score indicating how closely a document and the query match. In this note we explore and categorise a range of similarity heuristics described in the literature. We have implemented all of these measures in a structured way, and have carried out retrieval experiments with a substantial subset of these measures.Our purpose with this work is threefold: first, in enumerating the various measures in an orthogonal framework we make it straightforward for other researchers to describe and discuss similarity measures; second, by experimenting with a wide range of the measures, we hope to observe which features yield good retrieval behaviour in a variety of retrieval environments; and third, by describing our results so far, to gather feedback on the issues we have uncovered. We demonstrate that it is surprisingly difficult to identify which techniques work best, and comment on the experimental methodology required to support any claims as to the superiority of one method over another.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
How reliable are the results of large-scale information retrieval experiments?
Zobel, J. (1998) · Proceedings of the 21st annual international ACM SIGIR conference on Research and development in information retrieval · doi:10.1145/290941.291014 · Cited by 579
Self-citation
Cited by
Multilayer SOM With Tree-Structured Data for Efficient Document Retrieval and Plagiarism Detection
Chow, T. W. S., & Rahman, M. K. M. (2009) · IEEE Transactions on Neural Networks · doi:10.1109/tnn.2009.2023394 · Cited by 67
TREC Deep Learning Track: Reusable Test Collections in the Large Data Regime
Craswell, N., Mitra, B., Yilmaz, E., Campos, D., Voorhees, E. M., & Soboroff, I. (2021) · Proceedings of the 44th International ACM SIGIR Conference on Research and Development in Information Retrieval · doi:10.1145/3404835.3463249 · Cited by 58
Chen, Q., Du, J., Kim, S., Wilbur, W. J., & Lu, Z. (2020) · BMC Medical Informatics and Decision Making · doi:10.1186/s12911-020-1044-0 · Cited by 19
Rahman, M. K. M., & Chow, T. W. S. (2010) · Expert Systems with Applications · doi:10.1016/j.eswa.2009.09.002 · Cited by 11
Metadata
- Authors
- Zobel, J., & Moffat, A.
- Venue
- ACM SIGIR Forum
- Published
- 1998-04
- Volume
- 32
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 18-34
- ISSN
- 0163-5840 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W1965657003
- Cited by
- 378
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 34.47
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- hybrid
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Exploring the similarity space. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1145/281250.281256
- The paper
- Zobel, J., & Moffat, A. (1998). Exploring the similarity space. ACM SIGIR Forum. https://doi.org/10.1145/281250.281256
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.