The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Matching Real Fabrics with Micro-Appearance Models
Open accessAbstract
Micro-appearance models explicitly model the interaction of light with microgeometry at the fiber scale to produce realistic appearance. To effectively match them to real fabrics, we introduce a new appearance matching framework to determine their parameters. Given a micro-appearance model and photographs of the fabric under many different lighting conditions, we optimize for parameters that best match the photographs using a method based on calculating derivatives during rendering. This highly applicable framework, we believe, is a useful research tool because it simplifies development and testing of new models. Using the framework, we systematically compare several types of micro-appearance models. We acquired computed microtomography (micro CT) scans of several fabrics, photographed the fabrics under many viewing/illumination conditions, and matched several appearance models to this data. We compare a new fiber-based light scattering model to the previously used microflake model. We also compare representing cloth microgeometry using volumes derived directly from the micro CT data to using explicit fibers reconstructed from the volumes. From our comparisons, we make the following conclusions: (1) given a fiber-based scattering model, volume- and fiber-based microgeometry representations are capable of very similar quality, and (2) using a fiber-specific scattering model is crucial to good results as it achieves considerably higher accuracy than prior work.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Feature detection with automatic scale selection
Lindeberg, T. (1998) · International Journal of Computer Vision · doi:10.1023/a:1008045108935 · Cited by 2,541
Cited by
Learning Representations for Automatic Colorization
Larsson, G., Maire, M., & Shakhnarovich, G. (2016) · Lecture Notes in Computer Science · doi:10.1007/978-3-319-46493-0_35 · Cited by 946
Learning Joint Spatial-Temporal Transformations for Video Inpainting
Zeng, Y., Fu, J., & Chao, H. (2020) · Lecture Notes in Computer Science · doi:10.1007/978-3-030-58517-4_31 · Cited by 281
Impact of Foveated Rendering on Procedural Task Training
Radkowski, R., & Raul, S. (2019) · Lecture Notes in Computer Science · doi:10.1007/978-3-030-21607-8_20 · Cited by 5
Metadata
- Authors
- Khungurn, P., Schroeder, D., Zhao, S., Bala, K., & Marschner, S.
- Venue
- ACM Transactions on Graphics
- Published
- 2015-12-29
- Volume
- 35
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 1-26
- ISSN
- 0730-0301 (ISSN-L)
- 1557-7368
- OpenAlex
- W2261730354
- Cited by
- 520
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 116.13
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Matching Real Fabrics with Micro-Appearance Models. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1145/2818648
- The paper
- Khungurn, P., Schroeder, D., Zhao, S., Bala, K., & Marschner, S. (2015). Matching Real Fabrics with Micro-Appearance Models. ACM Transactions on Graphics. https://doi.org/10.1145/2818648
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.