The DOI matches its Crossref record; 91 of the 91 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Web Service Composition: A Survey of Techniques and Tools
Open accessAbstract
Web services are a consolidated reality of the modern Web with tremendous, increasing impact on everyday computing tasks. They turned the Web into the largest, most accepted, and most vivid distributed computing platform ever. Yet, the use and integration of Web services into composite services or applications, which is a highly sensible and conceptually non-trivial task, is still not unleashing its full magnitude of power. A consolidated analysis framework that advances the fundamental understanding of Web service composition building blocks in terms of concepts, models, languages, productivity support techniques, and tools is required. This framework is necessary to enable effective exploration, understanding, assessing, comparing, and selecting service composition models, languages, techniques, platforms, and tools. This article establishes such a framework and reviews the state of the art in service composition from an unprecedented, holistic perspective.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code
Fowler, M. (2002) · Lecture Notes in Computer Science · doi:10.1007/3-540-45672-4_31 · Cited by 5,591
Architectural styles and the design of network-based software architectures
Fielding, R. T., & Taylor, R. N. (2000) · Cited by 5,094
A Extensible Markup Language XML
(2009) · Foundations of Semantic Web Technologies · doi:10.1201/9781420090512-18 · Cited by 4,824
Linked Data - The Story So Far
Bizer, C., Heath, T., & Berners-Lee, T. (2009) · International Journal on Semantic Web and Information Systems · doi:10.4018/jswis.2009081901 · Cited by 4,525
Resnick, P., & Varian, H. R. (1997) · Communications of the ACM · doi:10.1145/245108.245121 · Cited by 3,772
Goecks, J., Nekrutenko, A., Taylor, J., & The Galaxy Team (2010) · Genome Biology · doi:10.1186/gb-2010-11-8-r86 · Cited by 3,453
A survey of approaches to automatic schema matching
Rahm, E., & Bernstein, P. A. (2001) · The VLDB Journal · doi:10.1007/s007780100057 · Cited by 3,352
van der Aalst, W. M. P., ter Hofstede, A. H. M., Kiepuszewski, B., & Barros, A. P. (2003) · Distributed and Parallel Databases · doi:10.1023/a:1022883727209 · Cited by 2,613
DAML-S: Semantic Markup For Web Services
Ankolekar, A., Burstein, M. H., Hobbs, J. R., Lassila, O., Martin, D. L., McIlraith, S. A., Narayanan, S., Paolucci, M., Payne, T. R., Sycara, K. ∈., et al. (2001) · Cited by 2,404
The Transport Layer Security (TLS) Protocol Version 1.1
Dierks, T., & Rescorla, E. (2006) · doi:10.17487/rfc4346 · Cited by 2,278
Cited by
Systematically Understanding the Cyber Attack Business: A Survey
Huang, K., Siegel, M., & Madnick, S. (2019) · ACM Computing Surveys · doi:10.1145/3199674 · Cited by 112
Metadata
- Authors
- Lemos, A. L., Daniel, F., & Benatallah, B.
- Venue
- ACM Computing Surveys
- Published
- 2015-12-09
- Volume
- 48
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 1-41
- ISSN
- 0360-0300 (ISSN-L)
- 1557-7341
- OpenAlex
- W2192583762
- Cited by
- 320
- References
- 91
- FWCI
- 96.40
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Web Service Composition: A Survey of Techniques and Tools. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1145/2831270
- The paper
- Lemos, A. L., Daniel, F., & Benatallah, B. (2016). Web Service Composition: A Survey of Techniques and Tools. ACM Computing Surveys. https://doi.org/10.1145/2831270
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
