Cited by 8Electronic Health Records SystemsData Visualization and AnalyticsHealthcare Technology and Patient Monitoring

Augmenting EHR interfaces for enhanced nurse communication and decision making

Chetta, Alessandro, Carrington, Jane M., Forbes, Angus Graeme·2015·Proceedings of the 2015 Workshop on Visual Analytics in Healthcare

Abstract

The use of electronic health records (EHRs) in clinical environments provides new opportunities for nurses to integrate data analyses into their practice. While having access to these records has many benefits, the act of recording, retrieving, and analyzing this data can nonetheless introduce communication issues, as navigating and interpreting large amounts of heterogeneous data can be difficult, and conclusions can be hard to validate. In this paper, we describe a series of integrated visual interfaces to help nurses document and reason about patient data and about clinicians' understanding of patient data. The interfaces present the output of a predictive algorithm that makes use of historical EHR data, patient vital signs, and nurse handoff reports in order to classify a patient in terms of their likelihood of experiencing clinical events. Furthermore, the interfaces enable the nurses to quickly explore the original data and to examine other nurses' interpretation of patient activity during previous shifts. We present a series of usage scenarios that introduce our interactive visualization tools in the context of real-world healthcare situations.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1145/2836034.2836038

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Hunter and Forbes's work suggests a distinct role for AI prediction from traditional CDS: facilitating problem-based report and assessment during handoffs.

    “Hunter and Forbes's work56,63,64 suggests a distinct role for AI prediction from traditional CDS: facilitating problem-based report and assessment during handoffs.”
  • User-design work for EHR-integrated shift-change handoff support had similar ideas, arriving at a design which blended data and predictive risks.

    “User-design work for EHR-integrated shift-change handoff support had similar ideas, arriving at a design which blended data and predictive risks.56,64”
  • Several small studies from other nursing contexts have found similar themes.

    “Several small studies from other nursing contexts have found similar themes.”
  • Forbes and colleagues envisioned a dynamic EHR integrated shift-report summary for nurses including key data, diagnoses, and predicted adverse events.

    “Forbes and colleagues56,64 envisioned a dynamic EHR integrated shift-report summary for nurses including key data, diagnoses, and predicted adverse events.”

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 19 · Cited by 8

Authors
Chetta, A., Carrington, J. M., & Forbes, A. G.
Affiliations
  • University of Illinois Chicago (US)
  • University of Arizona (US)
Venue
Proceedings of the 2015 Workshop on Visual Analytics in Healthcare
Publisher
ACM
Published
2015-10-25
Pages
1-6
OpenAlex
W2196146583
Cited by
8
References
19
Citations by year
2023: 1 · 2022: 1 · 2021: 4 · 2018: 1 · 2017: 1
FWCI
1.14
Type
conference paper
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Workshop on Visual Analytics in Healthcare (VAHC) (publishedVersion)
Funders
National Institutes of Health (R01EB020395)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › Health Information Management › Electronic Health Records Systems
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition › Data Visualization and Analytics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Surgery › Healthcare Technology and Patient Monitoring
Keywords
electronic health records, nursing communication, clinical decision-making, interactive visualization, predictive algorithms, clinical event prediction, exploratory data analysis, heterogeneous clinical data, application scenarios

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review