Cited by 113Emotion and Mood RecognitionNon-Invasive Vital Sign MonitoringHeart Rate Variability and Autonomic Control

COGCAM: Contact-free Measurement of Cognitive Stress During Computer Tasks with a Digital Camera

Open access
McDuff, Daniel J., Hernandez, Javier, Gontarek, Sarah, Picard, Rosalind W.·2016·Proceedings of the 2016 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems

Abstract

Contact-free camera-based measurement of cognitive stress opens up new possibilities for human-computer interaction with applications in remote learning, stress monitoring, and optimization of workload for user experience. The autonomic nervous system controls the inter-beat intervals of the heart and breathing patterns, and these signals change under cognitive stress. We built a participant-independent cognitive stress recognition model based on photoplethysmographic signals measured remotely at a distance of 3 meters. We tested the model on naturalistic responses from 10 individuals completing randomized-order computer-based tasks (ball control and card sorting). The system successfully detected increased stress during the tasks, which were consistent with self-report measures. Changes in heart rate variability were more discriminative indicators of cognitive stress than were heart rate and breathing rate.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1145/2858036.2858247

Cites

2 of 2 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Previous research has shown that various eye movements can indicate increased cognitive demand or derive the user proficiency during interaction.

    “However, previous research has shown that various eye movements can also indicate increased cognitive demand [63,131,133] or derive the user proficiency during interaction [151].”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
McDuff, D. J., Hernandez, J., Gontarek, S., & Picard, R. W.
Affiliations
Massachusetts Institute of Technology (US)
Venue
Proceedings of the 2016 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems
Publisher
ACM
Published
2016-05-07
Pages
4000-4004
OpenAlex
W2394865193
Cited by
113
References
2
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 4 · 2024: 8 · 2023: 9 · 2022: 10 · 2021: 9 · 2020: 17 · 2019: 15 · 2018: 19 · 2017: 16 · 2016: 4
FWCI
20.82
Type
conference paper
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (publishedVersion)
  • DSpace@MIT (Massachusetts Institute of Technology) (submittedVersion, cc-by-nc-sa)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Emotion and Mood Recognition
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Biomedical Engineering › Non-Invasive Vital Sign Monitoring
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine › Heart Rate Variability and Autonomic Control
Keywords
photoplethysmography, heart rate variability, respiratory rate, heart rate, autonomic nervous system, workload optimization, human-computer interaction, card sorting

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review