The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Different perspectives on information systems: problems and solutions
Abstract
The paper puts information systems (IS) research dealing with IS problems into perspective. IS problems are surveyed and classified. Using the IS research framework suggested by Ives, Hamilton, and Davis, research into IS problems is classified into several perspectives whose relevance in coping with the problems is discussed. Research perspectives focusing on IS operations environment, IS development process, IS development organization, IS development methods, and IS theories are distinguished. The paper concludes with suggestions for future research and how to deal with IS problems in practice.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
MIS problems and failures: A socio- technical perspective
Bostrom, R. P., & Heinen, J. S. (1977) · MIS Quarterly · doi:10.2307/248710 · Cited by 1,329
Cited by
Qualitative research methods in health technology assessment: a review of the literature.
Murphy, Dingwall, Greatbatch, Parker, & Watson (1998) · Health Technology Assessment · doi:10.3310/hta2160 · Cited by 1,107
Kaplan, B. (2001) · International Journal of Medical Informatics · doi:10.1016/s1386-5056(01)00184-8 · Cited by 380
Evaluating informatics applications – clinical decision support systems literature review
Kaplan, B. (2001) · International Journal of Medical Informatics · doi:10.1016/s1386-5056(01)00183-6 · Cited by 350
Addressing organizational issues into the evaluation of medical systems
Kaplan, B. (1997) · Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association · doi:10.1136/jamia.1997.0040094 · Cited by 175
Metadata
- Authors
- Lyytinen, K.
- Venue
- ACM Computing Surveys
- Published
- 1987-03
- Volume
- 19
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 5-46
- ISSN
- 0360-0300 (ISSN-L)
- 1557-7341
- OpenAlex
- W2036500097
- Cited by
- 287
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 26.84
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
