Cited by 690Cloud Computing and Resource ManagementSoftware System Performance and ReliabilityDistributed systems and fault tolerance

Borg, Omega, and Kubernetes

Open access
Burns, Brendan, Grant, Brian, Oppenheimer, David, Brewer, Eric, Wilkes, John·2016·Communications of the ACM

Abstract

Lessons learned from three container-management systems over a decade.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1145/2890784

Cites

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Borg [25], the Kubernetes lineage [52], Tetris [26], Hawk [27], and Sparrow [28] pack stateless jobs; Gaia [22] optimizes geo-distributed training.

    “Borg [25], the Kubernetes lineage [52], Tetris [26], Hawk [27], and Sparrow [28] pack stateless jobs; Gaia [22] optimizes geo-distributed training .”

    From Janus: Joint Prefill/Decode Disaggregation with KV-Cache-Aware Multi-Cloud Routing for Edge-Adjacent LLM Serving (2026) · cites this paper as [52]

    The paper identifies Kubernetes as a successor in the Borg–Omega lineage and describes Kubernetes pods and a controller for batch jobs (Containers section). It also says Borg runs disparate workloads on shared machines to improve utilization. It does not characterize Kubernetes as packing specifically stateless jobs; the other named systems have separate citations and are not assessed here. (LLM, conf=0.83)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

No citation lists for this paper

No citation lists for this paper yet — checked again daily.

References 3 · Cited by 690

Research works printed but not linked: 2

  1. Burrows, M. The Chubby lock service for loosely coupled distributed systems. In Proceedings from the Symposium on Operating System Design and Implementation (OSDI). Seattle, WA, 2006.
  2. Schwarzkopf, M., Konwinski, A., Abd-el-Malek and M., Wilkes, J. Omega: Flexible, scalable schedulers for large compute clusters. In Proceedings from the European Conference on Computer Systems (EuroSys). Prague, Czech Republic, 2013.

Authors
Burns, B., Grant, B., Oppenheimer, D., Brewer, E., & Wilkes, J.
Affiliations
Google (United States) (US)
Venue
Communications of the ACM
Published
2016-04-26
Volume
59
Issue
5
Pages
50-57
ISSN
  • 0001-0782 (ISSN-L)
  • 1557-7317
OpenAlex
W2290712622
Cited by
690
References
3
Citations by year
2026: 141 · 2025: 97 · 2024: 53 · 2023: 52 · 2022: 40 · 2021: 62 · 2020: 69 · 2019: 69 · 2018: 62 · 2017: 34 · 2016: 10
FWCI
130.54
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
Communications of the ACM (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Information Systems › Cloud Computing and Resource Management
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Networks and Communications › Software System Performance and Reliability
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Networks and Communications › Distributed systems and fault tolerance
Keywords
Borg, OMEGA, Kubernetes, container orchestration, distributed systems, fault tolerance

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review