Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 395

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Using filtering agents to improve prediction quality in the GroupLens research collaborative filtering system

Open access
Sarwar, Badrul M., Konstan, Joseph A., Borchers, Al, Herlocker, Jon, Miller, Brad, Riedl, John·1998·Proceedings of the 1998 ACM conference on Computer supported cooperative work

Abstract

Collaborative filtering systems help address information overload by usingthe opinions of users in a community to make personal recommendations fordocuments to each user. Many collaborative filtering systems have few useropinions relative to the large number of documents available. This sparsityproblem can reduce the utility of the filtering system by reducing thenumber of documents for which the system can make recommendations andadversely affecting the quality of recommendations. This paper defines andimplements a model for integrating content-based ratings into acollaborative filtering system. The filterbot model allows collaborativefiltering systems to address sparsity by tapping the strength of contentfiltering techniques. We identify and evaluate metrics for assessing theeffectiveness of filterbots specifically, and filtering system enhancementsin general. Finally, we experimentally validate the filterbot approach byshowing that even simple filterbots such as spell checking can increase theutility for users of sparsely populated collaborative filtering systems.Keywords Collaborative filtering, information filtering, content analysis,recommendation systems, social filtering, GroupLens Research, informationfiltering agents.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1145/289444.289509

Cites

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cited by

Metadata

Authors
Sarwar, B. M., Konstan, J. A., Borchers, A., Herlocker, J., Miller, B., & Riedl, J.
Venue
Proceedings of the 1998 ACM conference on Computer supported cooperative work
Publisher
ACM
Published
1998-11
Pages
345-354
OpenAlex
W2028036481
Cited by
395
References
0
FWCI
14.79
Type
conference paper
Language
en
Open access
green

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.