The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Using filtering agents to improve prediction quality in the GroupLens research collaborative filtering system
Open accessAbstract
Collaborative filtering systems help address information overload by usingthe opinions of users in a community to make personal recommendations fordocuments to each user. Many collaborative filtering systems have few useropinions relative to the large number of documents available. This sparsityproblem can reduce the utility of the filtering system by reducing thenumber of documents for which the system can make recommendations andadversely affecting the quality of recommendations. This paper defines andimplements a model for integrating content-based ratings into acollaborative filtering system. The filterbot model allows collaborativefiltering systems to address sparsity by tapping the strength of contentfiltering techniques. We identify and evaluate metrics for assessing theeffectiveness of filterbots specifically, and filtering system enhancementsin general. Finally, we experimentally validate the filterbot approach byshowing that even simple filterbots such as spell checking can increase theutility for users of sparsely populated collaborative filtering systems.Keywords Collaborative filtering, information filtering, content analysis,recommendation systems, social filtering, GroupLens Research, informationfiltering agents.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Item-based collaborative filtering recommendation algorithms
Sarwar, B., Karypis, G., Konstan, J., & Riedl, J. (2001) · Proceedings of the 10th international conference on World Wide Web · doi:10.1145/371920.372071 · Cited by 9,135
Self-citationEvaluating collaborative filtering recommender systems
Herlocker, J. L., Konstan, J. A., Terveen, L. G., & Riedl, J. T. (2004) · ACM Transactions on Information Systems · doi:10.1145/963770.963772 · Cited by 5,798
Self-citation
Metadata
- Authors
- Sarwar, B. M., Konstan, J. A., Borchers, A., Herlocker, J., Miller, B., & Riedl, J.
- Venue
- Proceedings of the 1998 ACM conference on Computer supported cooperative work
- Publisher
- ACM
- Published
- 1998-11
- Pages
- 345-354
- OpenAlex
- W2028036481
- Cited by
- 395
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 14.79
- Type
- conference paper
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.