The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
DeepBurning: automatic generation of FPGA-based learning accelerators for the neural network family
Abstract
Recent advances in Neural Networks (NN) are enabling more and more innovative applications. As an energy-efficient hardware solution, machine learning accelerators for CNNs or traditional ANNs are also gaining popularity in the area of embedded vision, robotics and cyberphysics. However, the design parameters of NN models vary significantly from application to application. Hence, it's hard to provide one general and highly-efficient hardware solution to accommodate all of them, and it is also impractical for the domain-specific developers to customize their flown hardware targeting on a specific NN model. To deal with this dilemma, this study proposes a design automation tool, DeepBurning, allowing the application developers to build from scratch learning accelerators that targets their specific NN models with custom configurations and optimized performance. DeepBurning includes a RTL-level accelerator generator and a coordinated compiler that generates the control flow and data layout under the user-specified constraints. The results can be used to implement FPGA-based NN accelerator or help generate chip design for early design stage. In general, DeepBurning supports a large family of NN models, and greatly simplifies the design flow of NN accelerators for the machine learning or AI application developers. The evaluation shows that the generated learning accelerators burnt to our FPGA board exhibit great power efficiency compared to state-of-the-art FPGA-based solutions.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Hinton, G., Deng, L., Yu, D., Dahl, G., Mohamed, A.-R., Jaitly, N., Senior, A., Vanhoucke, V., Nguyen, P., Sainath, T., et al. (2012) · IEEE Signal Processing Magazine · doi:10.1109/msp.2012.2205597 · Cited by 10,260
Cited by
Bit Fusion: Bit-Level Dynamically Composable Architecture for Accelerating Deep Neural Network
Sharma, H., Park, J., Suda, N., Lai, L., Chau, B., Kim, J. K., Chandra, V., & Esmaeilzadeh, H. (2018) · 2018 ACM/IEEE 45th Annual International Symposium on Computer Architecture (ISCA) · doi:10.1109/isca.2018.00069 · Cited by 543
Accelerating Binarized Convolutional Neural Networks with Software-Programmable FPGAs
Zhao, R., Song, W., Zhang, W., Xing, T., Lin, J.-H., Srivastava, M., Gupta, R., & Zhang, Z. (2017) · Proceedings of the 2017 ACM/SIGDA International Symposium on Field-Programmable Gate Arrays · doi:10.1145/3020078.3021741 · Cited by 429
A survey of FPGA-based accelerators for convolutional neural networks
Mittal, S. (2020) · Neural Computing and Applications · doi:10.1007/s00521-018-3761-1 · Cited by 429
PUMA: A Programmable Ultra-efficient Memristor-based Accelerator for Machine Learning Inference
Ankit, A., Hajj, I. E., Chalamalasetti, S. R., Ndu, G., Foltin, M., Williams, R. S., Faraboschi, P., Hwu, W.-M. W., Strachan, J. P., Roy, K., et al. (2019) · Proceedings of the Twenty-Fourth International Conference on Architectural Support for Programming Languages and Operating Systems · doi:10.1145/3297858.3304049 · Cited by 424
Dynamic Adaptive DNN Surgery for Inference Acceleration on the Edge
Hu, C., Bao, W., Wang, D., & Liu, F. (2019) · IEEE INFOCOM 2019 - IEEE Conference on Computer Communications · doi:10.1109/infocom.2019.8737614 · Cited by 416
Metadata
- Authors
- Wang, Y., Xu, J., Han, Y., Li, H., & Li, X.
- Venue
- Proceedings of the 53rd Annual Design Automation Conference
- Publisher
- ACM
- Published
- 2016-06-05
- Pages
- 1-6
- ISSN
- 0738-100X (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2396572963
- Cited by
- 205
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 23.15
- Type
- conference paper
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: DeepBurning: automatic generation of FPGA-based learning accelerators for the neural network family. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1145/2897937.2898003
- The paper
- Wang, Y., Xu, J., Han, Y., Li, H., & Li, X. (2016). DeepBurning: automatic generation of FPGA-based learning accelerators for the neural network family. Proceedings of the 53rd Annual Design Automation Conference. https://doi.org/10.1145/2897937.2898003
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.