The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Polynomial time approximation schemes for Euclidean traveling salesman and other geometric problems
Open accessAbstract
We present a polynomial time approximation scheme for Euclidean TSP in fixed dimensions. For every fixed c > 1 and given any n nodes in ℛ 2 , a randomized version of the scheme finds a (1 + 1/ c )-approximation to the optimum traveling salesman tour in O(n (log n ) O(c) ) time. When the nodes are in ℛ d , the running time increases to O(n (log n ) (O(√ c)) d-1 ). For every fixed c, d the running time is n · poly(log n ), that is nearly linear in n . The algorithmm can be derandomized, but this increases the running time by a factor O(n d ). The previous best approximation algorithm for the problem (due to Christofides) achieves a 3/2-aproximation in polynomial time. We also give similar approximation schemes for some other NP-hard Euclidean problems: Minimum Steiner Tree, k -TSP, and k -MST. (The running times of the algorithm for k -TSP and k -MST involve an additional multiplicative factor k .) The previous best approximation algorithms for all these problems achieved a constant-factor approximation. We also give efficient approximation schemes for Euclidean Min-Cost Matching, a problem that can be solved exactly in polynomial time. All our algorithms also work, with almost no modification, when distance is measured using any geometric norm (such as ℓ p for p ≥ 1 or other Minkowski norms). They also have simple parallel (i.e., NC) implementations.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Optimization, approximation, and complexity classes
Papadimitriou, C. H., & Yannakakis, M. (1991) · Journal of Computer and System Sciences · doi:10.1016/0022-0000(91)90023-x · Cited by 1,653
Cited by
The Design of Approximation Algorithms
Williamson, D. P., & Shmoys, D. B. (2011) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/cbo9780511921735 · Cited by 1,301
Moore, C., & Mertens, S. (2011) · doi:10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199233212.001.0001 · Cited by 347
An improved LP-based approximation for steiner tree
Byrka, J., Grandoni, F., Rothvoß, T., & Sanità, L. (2010) · Proceedings of the forty-second ACM symposium on Theory of computing · doi:10.1145/1806689.1806769 · Cited by 296
Challenges and opportunities in quantum optimization
Abbas, A., Ambainis, A., Augustino, B., Bärtschi, A., Buhrman, H., Coffrin, C., Cortiana, G., Dunjko, V., Egger, D. J., Elmegreen, B. G., et al. (2024) · Nature Reviews Physics · doi:10.1038/s42254-024-00770-9 · Cited by 201
“If the problem is restricted to the Euclidean TSP (in which all points are in the d -dimensional space d R and edge weights equal their Euclidean distances), then, remarkably, there exists an explicit PTAS to solve such TSP instances 31 .”
Metadata
- Authors
- Arora, S.
- Venue
- Journal of the ACM
- Published
- 1998-09
- Volume
- 45
- Issue
- 5
- Pages
- 753-782
- ISSN
- 0004-5411 (ISSN-L)
- 1557-735X
- OpenAlex
- W2165142526
- Cited by
- 1,137
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 20.09
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Polynomial time approximation schemes for Euclidean traveling salesman and other geometric problems. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1145/290179.290180
- The paper
- Arora, S. (1998). Polynomial time approximation schemes for Euclidean traveling salesman and other geometric problems. Journal of the ACM. https://doi.org/10.1145/290179.290180
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.