The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Web document clustering: a feasibility demonstration
Abstract
Users of Web search engines are often forced to sift through the long ordered list of document returned by the engines. The IR community has explored document clustering as an alternative method of organizing retrieval results, but clustering has yet to be deployed on the major search engines. The paper articulates the unique requirements of Web document clustering and reports on the first evaluation of clustering methods in this domain. A key requirement is that the methods create their clusters based on the short snippets returned by Web search engines. Surprisingly, we find that clusters based on snippets are almost as good as clusters created using the full text of Web documents. To satisfy the stringent requirements of the Web domain, we introduce an incremental, linear time (in the document collection size) algorithm called Suffix Tree Clustering (STC). which creates clusters based on phrases shared between documents. We show that STC is faster than standard clustering methods in this domain, and argue that Web document clustering via STC is both feasible and potentially beneficial.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Social big data: recent achievements and new challenges
Bello-Orgaz, G., Jung, J. J., & Camacho, D. (2016) · Information Fusion · doi:10.1016/j.inffus.2015.08.005 · Cited by 846
“Text mining techniques can be applied for automatic organization, navigation, retrieval, and summary of huge volumes of text documents [59–61].”
MethodLearning to cluster web search results
Zeng, H.-J., He, Q.-C., Chen, Z., Ma, W.-Y., & Ma, J. (2004) · Proceedings of the 27th annual international ACM SIGIR conference on Research and development in information retrieval · doi:10.1145/1008992.1009030 · Cited by 587
A Data-Clustering Algorithm on Distributed Memory Multiprocessors
Dhillon, I. S., & Modha, D. S. (2002) · Lecture Notes in Computer Science · doi:10.1007/3-540-46502-2_13 · Cited by 386
Efficient phrase-based document indexing for Web document clustering
Hammouda, K. M., & Kamel, M. S. (2004) · IEEE Transactions on Knowledge and Data Engineering · doi:10.1109/tkde.2004.58 · Cited by 316
Using Large Language Models to Generate, Validate, and Apply User Intent Taxonomies
Shah, C., White, R., Andersen, R., Buscher, G., Counts, S., Das, S., Montazer, A., Manivannan, S., Neville, J., Rangan, N., et al. (2025) · ACM Transactions on the Web · doi:10.1145/3732294 · Cited by 33
Metadata
- Authors
- Zamir, O., & Etzioni, O.
- Venue
- Proceedings of the 21st annual international ACM SIGIR conference on Research and development in information retrieval
- Publisher
- ACM
- Published
- 1998-08
- Pages
- 46-54
- OpenAlex
- W2100958137
- Cited by
- 1,055
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 19.06
- Type
- conference paper
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Web document clustering: a feasibility demonstration. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1145/290941.290956
- The paper
- Zamir, O., & Etzioni, O. (1998). Web document clustering: a feasibility demonstration. Proceedings of the 21st annual international ACM SIGIR conference on Research and development in information retrieval. https://doi.org/10.1145/290941.290956
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.