The DOI matches its Crossref record; 4 of the 4 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Understanding and constructing shared spaces with mixed-reality boundaries
Open accessAbstract
We propose an approach to creating shared mixed realities based on the construction of transparent boundaries between real and virtual spaces. First, we introduce a taxonomy that classifies current approaches to shared spaces according to the three dimensions of transportation, artificiality, and spatiality. Second, we discuss our experience of staging a poetry performance simultaneously within real and virtual theaters. This demonstrates the complexities involved in establishing social interaction between real and virtual spaces and motivates the development of a systematic approach to mixing realities. Third, we introduce and demonstrate the technique of mixed-reality boundaries as a way of joining real and virtual spaces together in order to address some of these problems.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
A simplest systematics for the organization of turn-taking for conversation
Sacks, H., Schegloff, E. A., & Jefferson, G. (1974) · Language · doi:10.2307/412243 · Cited by 11,350
Tangible bits: towards seamless interfaces between people, bits and atoms
Ishii, H., & Ullmer, B. (1997) · Proceedings of the ACM SIGCHI Conference on Human factors in computing systems · doi:10.1145/258549.258715 · Cited by 3,853
Musings on Telepresence and Virtual Presence
Sheridan, T. B. (1992) · Presence: Teleoperators and Virtual Environments · doi:10.1162/pres.1992.1.1.120 · Cited by 1,344 · cited 1×
“Just as virtual reality research makes a distinction between the technological concept of immersion and the psychological concept of presence [Sheridan 1992; Slater et al. 1994], so we also separate transportation from notions of presence or co-presence.”
BackgroundTechniques for addressing fundamental privacy and disruption tradeoffs in awareness support systems
Hudson, S. E., & Smith, I. (1996) · Proceedings of the 1996 ACM conference on Computer supported cooperative work · doi:10.1145/240080.240295 · Cited by 344
Cited by
Cognitive Infocommunications (CogInfoCom)
Baranyi, P., Csapo, A., & Sallai, G. (2015) · Springer eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-3-319-19608-4 · Cited by 584
An experimental study on the role of touch in shared virtual environments
Basdogan, C., Ho, C.-H., Srinivasan, M. A., & Slater, M. (2000) · ACM Transactions on Computer-Human Interaction · doi:10.1145/365058.365082 · Cited by 443
Exploiting space and location as a design framework for interactive mobile systems
Dix, A., Rodden, T., Davies, N., Trevor, J., Friday, A., & Palfreyman, K. (2000) · ACM Transactions on Computer-Human Interaction · doi:10.1145/355324.355325 · Cited by 287
Performance-Led Research in the Wild
Benford, S., Greenhalgh, C., Crabtree, A., Flintham, M., Walker, B., Marshall, J., Koleva, B., Rennick Egglestone, S., Giannachi, G., Adams, M., et al. (2013) · ACM Transactions on Computer-Human Interaction · doi:10.1145/2491500.2491502 · Cited by 160
Self-citation
Metadata
- Authors
- Benford, S., Greenhalgh, C., Reynard, G., Brown, C., & Koleva, B.
- Venue
- ACM Transactions on Computer-Human Interaction
- Published
- 1998-09
- Volume
- 5
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 185-223
- ISSN
- 1073-0516 (ISSN-L)
- 1557-7325
- OpenAlex
- W2125399815
- Cited by
- 302
- References
- 4
- FWCI
- 18.75
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Understanding and constructing shared spaces with mixed-reality boundaries. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1145/292834.292836
- The paper
- Benford, S., Greenhalgh, C., Reynard, G., Brown, C., & Koleva, B. (1998). Understanding and constructing shared spaces with mixed-reality boundaries. ACM Transactions on Computer-Human Interaction. https://doi.org/10.1145/292834.292836
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
