Cited by 35Ethics and Social Impacts of AIArtificial Intelligence ApplicationsCybernetics and Technology in Society

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Artificial intelligence: think again

Kaplan, Jerry·2016·Communications of the ACM

Abstract

Social and cultural conventions are an often-neglected aspect of intelligent-machine development.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1145/2950039

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cited by

Metadata

Authors
Kaplan, J.
Affiliations
Stanford University (US)
Corresponding author
Kaplan, Jerry
Venue
Communications of the ACM
Published
2016-12-20
Volume
60
Issue
1
Pages
36-38
ISSN
  • 0001-0782 (ISSN-L)
  • 1557-7317
OpenAlex
W2562856189
Cited by
35
References
0
Citations by year
2025: 3 · 2024: 4 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 6 · 2021: 3 · 2020: 3 · 2019: 3 · 2018: 5 · 2017: 4
FWCI
9.77
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Communications of the ACM (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Ethics and Social Impacts of AI
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Artificial Intelligence Applications
  • Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › History and Philosophy of Science › Cybernetics and Technology in Society
Keywords
artificial intelligence, social conventions, cultural norms, intelligent machines, machine development

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review