The DOI matches its Crossref record; 3 of the 3 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
An Argument For Design Space Reflection
Abstract
We argue that documenting, revisiting and reflecting on the design space of a project provides three important benefits. First it increases our awareness of the constraints introduced by particular design choices. Second, this qualifies our understanding of the way a design space has been filtered by design activities. Third we are prompted to challenge these constraints and reconsider disregarded opportunities. To support this argument, we revisit key activities from two projects in our interaction design lab's portfolio, selected because of the detailed documentation available. We also introduce SnapShot, the web-based tool we are developing for this method of design space reflection. Based on these examples, we present a critical discussion and outline areas of future research.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“helping them understand the design space -the space of possible ideas and solutions to a task and problem has been found to play an essential role in creative processes [23, 34, 45, 57].”
From Luminate: Structured Generation and Exploration of Design Space with Large Language Models for Human-AI Co-Creation (2024) · cites this paper as [23]
In the citing paper
“Thus, researchers have voiced the need to support design space thinking in creativity support tools, stating various benefits of offering designers the ability to leverage an understanding of the design space in creative processes [7, 10, 23, 32, 55, 57].”
From Luminate: Structured Generation and Exploration of Design Space with Large Language Models for Human-AI Co-Creation (2024) · cites this paper as [23]
Citations
Cites
Getting a grip on tangible interaction: a framework on physical space and social interaction
Hornecker, E., & Buur, J. (2006) · Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems · doi:10.1145/1124772.1124838 · Cited by 1,100
Staying open to interpretation: engaging multiple meanings in design and evaluation
Sengers, P., & Gaver, B. (2006) · Proceedings of the 6th conference on Designing Interactive systems · doi:10.1145/1142405.1142422 · Cited by 620 · cited 1×
“Sengers and Gaver [34] argue that the ambiguity in these design spaces encourages a different view of computer systems than is typically seen in HCI.”
BackgroundReflective design documentation
Dalsgaard, P., & Halskov, K. (2012) · Proceedings of the Designing Interactive Systems Conference · doi:10.1145/2317956.2318020 · Cited by 119
Self-citation
Research works printed but not linked: 32
- 10.1145/2317956.2317967 · DOI
- Beaudouin-Lafon , M. , and Mackay , W . Prototyping tools and techniques . In The Human Computer Interaction Hanbook. J. Jacko, A. Sears, J. Jacko, & A . Sears (Eds.). Laurence Erlbaum Associates . Hillsdale, NJ. ( 2003 ) 1017--1040. Beaudouin-Lafon, M., and Mackay, W. Prototyping tools and techniques. In The Human Computer Interaction Hanbook. J. Jacko, A. Sears, J. Jacko, & A. Sears (Eds.). Laurence Erlbaum Associates. Hillsdale, NJ. (2003) 1017--1040.
- 10.1145/2598510.2598533 · DOI
- 10.1145/2317956.2317968 · DOI
- Bullivant , L. Responsive environments: architecture, art and design. V&A . London . 2006 Bullivant, L. Responsive environments: architecture, art and design. V&A. London. 2006
- 10.1145/97243.97263 · DOI
- Carroll J.M. and Rosson M.B. 2003. Design rationale as theory. In Carroll J. (Ed.) HCI models theories and rameworks: Towards a multidisciplinary science. Morgan Kaufmann. London. (2003) 431--461. Carroll J.M. and Rosson M.B. 2003. Design rationale as theory. In Carroll J. (Ed.) HCI models theories and rameworks: Towards a multidisciplinary science. Morgan Kaufmann. London. (2003) 431--461. · DOI
- 10.1080/17493460802526412 · DOI
- 10.1145/355324.355325 · DOI
- Feder D. Automatic optical design. In Applied Optics. 2 12. (1963) 1209--1226. Feder D. Automatic optical design. In Applied Optics. 2 12. (1963) 1209--1226. · DOI
- 10.1145/2598510.2598588 · DOI
- 10.1145/223904.223964 · DOI · Paper page
- Gärdenfors P. Induction conceptual spaces and AI. In Philosophy of Science. 57 1. (1990) 78--95. Gärdenfors P. Induction conceptual spaces and AI. In Philosophy of Science. 57 1. (1990) 78--95. · DOI
- 10.1145/1978942.1979169 · DOI
- 10.1145/1142405.1142409 · DOI
- 10.1145/2421076.2421081 · DOI
- 10.1145/1375761.1375762 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1207/s15327051hci0603%264_2 · DOI
- McCullough , M. Digital Ground: Architecture , Pervasive Computing, and Environmental Knowing . MIT Press . Cambridge, MA. 2004 McCullough, M. Digital Ground: Architecture, Pervasive Computing, and Environmental Knowing. MIT Press. Cambridge, MA. 2004
- 10.1145/169059.169143 · DOI
- 10.1145/2317956.2318008 · DOI
- 10.1145/354666.354677 · DOI
- 10.1007/BF03037334 · DOI
- Sanders , E. and Westerlund , B . Experiencing, exploring and experimenting in and with co-design spaces . In Proc. Nordes No 4. 2011 Sanders, E. and Westerlund, B. Experiencing, exploring and experimenting in and with co-design spaces. In Proc. Nordes No 4. 2011
- Schön , D.A. The Reflective Practitioner . Basic Books . New York. 1983 Schön, D.A. The Reflective Practitioner. Basic Books. New York. 1983
- Schmit , L. and Fox , R . An integrated approach to structural synthesis and analysis . In AIAA Journal , 3 , 6 . (1965) 1104--1112 Schmit, L. and Fox, R. An integrated approach to structural synthesis and analysis. In AIAA Journal, 3,6. (1965) 1104--1112
- 10.1109/MS.2011.121 · DOI · Paper page
- Stolterman , E. , McAtee , J. , Royer , D. and Thandapani , S . 2008. Designerly tools . In Proc. DRS'08 DRS (2008) 116/1--116/14 Stolterman, E., McAtee, J., Royer, D. and Thandapani, S. 2008. Designerly tools. In Proc. DRS'08 DRS (2008) 116/1--116/14
- Warglien M. and Gärdenfors P. Semantics conceptual spaces and the meeting of minds. In Synthese 190 2. (2013) 2165--2193. Warglien M. and Gärdenfors P. Semantics conceptual spaces and the meeting of minds. In Synthese 190 2. (2013) 2165--2193. · DOI
- Westerlund , B . Design space conceptual tool - grasping the design process . In Proc. Nordes 2005 ( 2005 ) D2 . Westerlund, B. Design space conceptual tool - grasping the design process. In Proc. Nordes 2005 (2005) D2.
- 10.1017/S0890060406060057 · DOI
- 10.1145/1240624.1240704 · DOI
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Suh, S., Chen, M., Min, B., Li, T. J.-J., & Xia, H. (2024) · Proceedings of the CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems · doi:10.1145/3613904.3642400 · Cited by 148
Metadata
- Authors
- Dove, G., Hansen, N. B., & Halskov, K.
- Affiliations
- Aarhus University, Aarhus, Denmark
- Venue
- Proceedings of the 9th Nordic Conference on Human-Computer Interaction
- Publisher
- ACM
- Published
- 2016-10-23
- Pages
- 1-10
- Cited by
- 46
- References
- 3
- Funders
- The Danish Innovation Foundation (1311-00001B)
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
