CEML: Mixing and moving complex event processing and machine learning to the edge of the network for IoT applications
Abstract
The Internet of Things (IoT) is a growing field which is expected to generate and collect data everywhere at any time. Highly scalable cloud analytics systems are frequently being used to handle this data explosion. However, the ubiquitous nature of the IoT data imposes new technical and non-technical requirements which are difficult to address with a cloud deployment. To solve these problems, we need a new set of development technologies such as Distributed Data Mining and Ubiquitous Data Mining targeted and optimized towards IoT applications. In this paper, we present the Complex Event Machine Learning framework which proposes a set of tools for automatic distributed machine learning in (near-) real-time, automatic continuous evaluation tools, and automatic rules management for deployment of rules. These features are implemented for a deployment at the edge of the network instead of the cloud. We evaluate and validate our approach with a well-known classification problem.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
The framework in [115] deals with these challenges to support complex-event learning during intelligent manufacturing, thus facilitating the development of real-time application on IoT edge devices.
“In [115], a framework, dealing with these challenges, is developed to support complex-event learning during intelligent manufacturing, thus facilitating the development of real-time application on IoT edge devices.”
From Convergence of Edge Computing and Deep Learning: A Comprehensive Survey (2020) · cites this paper as [115]
Cites
An introduction to MCMC for machine learning.
Andrieu, C., de Freitas, N., Doucet, A., & Jordan, M. I. (2003) · Machine Learning · doi:10.1023/a:1020281327116 · Cited by 2,451 · see citing works
Dawid, A. P. (1984) · Journal of the Royal Statistical Society. Series A (General) · doi:10.2307/2981683 · Cited by 1,085 · see citing works
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Convergence of Edge Computing and Deep Learning: A Comprehensive Survey
Wang, X., Han, Y., Leung, V. C. M., Niyato, D., Yan, X., & Chen, X. (2020) · IEEE Communications Surveys & Tutorials · doi:10.1109/comst.2020.2970550 · Cited by 1,498 · see citing works
“In [115], a framework, dealing with these chal-”
Background
- Authors
- Soto, J. A. C., Jentsch, M., Preuveneers, D., & Ilie-Zudor, E.
- Affiliations
- Fraunhofer Institute for Applied Information Technology (DE)
- KU Leuven (BE)
- Institute for Computer Science and Control, MTA SZTAKI, Budapest, Hungary
- Venue
- Proceedings of the 6th International Conference on the Internet of Things
- Publisher
- ACM
- Published
- 2016-11-07
- Pages
- 103-110
- OpenAlex
- W2555541806
- Cited by
- 28
- References
- 2
- Citations by year
- 2024: 1 · 2023: 3 · 2021: 4 · 2020: 8 · 2019: 5 · 2018: 6 · 2017: 1
- FWCI
- 3.42
- Type
- conference paper
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- International Conference on the Internet of Things (IoT) (publishedVersion)
- Lirias (submittedVersion)
- Fraunhofer-Publica (Fraunhofer-Gesellschaft) (submittedVersion)
- Funders
- European Commission (609081, 614100, 691829)
- Research Fund KU Leuven
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Networks and Communications › IoT and Edge/Fog Computing
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Data Stream Mining Techniques
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Information Systems › Internet of Things and AI
- Keywords
- Internet of Things, distributed learning, complex event processing, edge computing, real-time analytics, continuous assessment, IoT data
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review