Cited by 28IoT and Edge/Fog ComputingData Stream Mining TechniquesInternet of Things and AI

CEML: Mixing and moving complex event processing and machine learning to the edge of the network for IoT applications

Soto, José Angel Carvajal, Jentsch, Marc, Preuveneers, Davy, Ilie-Zudor, Elisabeth·2016·Proceedings of the 6th International Conference on the Internet of Things

Abstract

The Internet of Things (IoT) is a growing field which is expected to generate and collect data everywhere at any time. Highly scalable cloud analytics systems are frequently being used to handle this data explosion. However, the ubiquitous nature of the IoT data imposes new technical and non-technical requirements which are difficult to address with a cloud deployment. To solve these problems, we need a new set of development technologies such as Distributed Data Mining and Ubiquitous Data Mining targeted and optimized towards IoT applications. In this paper, we present the Complex Event Machine Learning framework which proposes a set of tools for automatic distributed machine learning in (near-) real-time, automatic continuous evaluation tools, and automatic rules management for deployment of rules. These features are implemented for a deployment at the edge of the network instead of the cloud. We evaluate and validate our approach with a well-known classification problem.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1145/2991561.2991575

Cites

2 of 2 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The framework in [115] deals with these challenges to support complex-event learning during intelligent manufacturing, thus facilitating the development of real-time application on IoT edge devices.

    “In [115], a framework, dealing with these challenges, is developed to support complex-event learning during intelligent manufacturing, thus facilitating the development of real-time application on IoT edge devices.”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Soto, J. A. C., Jentsch, M., Preuveneers, D., & Ilie-Zudor, E.
Affiliations
  • Fraunhofer Institute for Applied Information Technology (DE)
  • KU Leuven (BE)
  • Institute for Computer Science and Control, MTA SZTAKI, Budapest, Hungary
Venue
Proceedings of the 6th International Conference on the Internet of Things
Publisher
ACM
Published
2016-11-07
Pages
103-110
OpenAlex
W2555541806
Cited by
28
References
2
Citations by year
2024: 1 · 2023: 3 · 2021: 4 · 2020: 8 · 2019: 5 · 2018: 6 · 2017: 1
FWCI
3.42
Type
conference paper
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • International Conference on the Internet of Things (IoT) (publishedVersion)
  • Lirias (submittedVersion)
  • Fraunhofer-Publica (Fraunhofer-Gesellschaft) (submittedVersion)
Funders
  • European Commission (609081, 614100, 691829)
  • Research Fund KU Leuven
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Networks and Communications › IoT and Edge/Fog Computing
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Data Stream Mining Techniques
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Information Systems › Internet of Things and AI
Keywords
Internet of Things, distributed learning, complex event processing, edge computing, real-time analytics, continuous assessment, IoT data

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review