The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Blockchain beyond bitcoin
Abstract
Blockchain technology has the potential to revolutionize applications and redefine the digital economy.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“The properties most cited include immutability, transparency, persistency, resilience, and openness (Underwood, 2016;Wright & De Filippi, 2015).”
From When Ostrom Meets Blockchain: Exploring the Potentials of Blockchain for Commons Governance (2021) · cites this paper as Underwood, 2016
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Gomber, P., Kauffman, R. J., Parker, C., & Weber, B. W. (2018) · Journal of Management Information Systems · doi:10.1080/07421222.2018.1440766 · Cited by 2,109
The future of manufacturing industry: a strategic roadmap toward Industry 4.0
Ghobakhloo, M. (2018) · Journal of Manufacturing Technology Management · doi:10.1108/jmtm-02-2018-0057 · Cited by 1,381
Ølnes, S., Ubacht, J., & Janssen, M. (2017) · Government Information Quarterly · doi:10.1016/j.giq.2017.09.007 · Cited by 1,107
A survey on privacy protection in blockchain system
Feng, Q., He, D., Zeadally, S., Khan, M. K., & Kumar, N. (2019) · Journal of Network and Computer Applications · doi:10.1016/j.jnca.2018.10.020 · Cited by 804
Blockchain practices, potentials, and perspectives in greening supply chains
Kouhizadeh, M., & Sarkis, J. (2018) · Sustainability · doi:10.3390/su10103652 · Cited by 726
Metadata
- Authors
- Underwood, S.
- Venue
- Communications of the ACM
- Published
- 2016-10-28
- Volume
- 59
- Issue
- 11
- Pages
- 15-17
- ISSN
- 0001-0782 (ISSN-L)
- 1557-7317
- OpenAlex
- W2544710688
- Cited by
- 1,181
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 235.57
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Blockchain beyond bitcoin. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1145/2994581
- The paper
- Underwood, S. (2016). Blockchain beyond bitcoin. Communications of the ACM. https://doi.org/10.1145/2994581
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
