Cited by 139Usability and User Interface DesignInteractive and Immersive DisplaysData Visualization and Analytics

Visual Menu Techniques

Open access
Bailly, Gilles, Lecolinet, Eric, Nigay, Laurence·2017·ACM Computing Surveys

Abstract

Menus are used for exploring and selecting commands in interactive applications. They are widespread in current systems and used by a large variety of users. As a consequence, they have motivated many studies in Human-Computer Interaction (HCI). Facing the large variety of menus, it is difficult to have a clear understanding of the design possibilities and to ascertain their similarities and differences. In this article, we address a main challenge of menu design: the need to characterize the design space of menus. To do this, we propose a taxonomy of menu properties that structures existing work on visual menus. As properties have an impact on the performance of the menu, we start by refining performance through a list of quality criteria and by reviewing existing analytical and empirical methods for quality evaluation. This taxonomy of menu properties is a step toward the elaboration of advanced predictive models of menu performance and the optimization of menus. A key point of this work is to focus both on menus and on the properties of menus, and then enable a fine-grained analysis in terms of performance.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1145/3002171

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Folding truncates items with lower priority or relevance, declutters the visual space, simplifies the User Interface, and guarantees that pertinent information is presented to the user.

    “Truncating items with lower priority or relevance-commonly referred to as folding-declutters the visual space.This simplifies the User Interface and guarantees that pertinent information is presented to the user, contributing to a more focused and efficient interaction (Bailly et al. 2016).”

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 163 · Cited by 139

Authors
Bailly, G., Lecolinet, E., & Nigay, L.
Affiliations
  • Télécom Paris (FR)
  • Telecom ParisTech, Paris-Saclay University, CNRS LTCI
  • Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique (FR)
Venue
ACM Computing Surveys
Published
2016-12-12
Volume
49
Issue
4
Pages
1-41
ISSN
  • 0360-0300 (ISSN-L)
  • 1557-7341
OpenAlex
W2563363262
Cited by
139
References
163
Citations by year
2026: 7 · 2025: 55 · 2024: 11 · 2023: 6 · 2022: 7 · 2021: 10 · 2020: 14 · 2019: 15 · 2018: 11 · 2017: 3
FWCI
15.08
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • ACM Computing Surveys (publishedVersion)
  • HAL (submittedVersion, other-oa)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Human-Computer Interaction › Usability and User Interface Design
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Human-Computer Interaction › Interactive and Immersive Displays
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition › Data Visualization and Analytics
Keywords
menu design, taxonomy (general classification scheme), quality standards, menu analysis, prediction model, menu optimization, command selection, interactive applications

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review