Cited by 449Sentiment Analysis and Opinion MiningTopic ModelingHate Speech and Cyberbullying Detection

Stance and Sentiment in Tweets

Open access
Mohammad, Saif M., Sobhani, Parinaz, Kiritchenko, Svetlana·2017·ACM Transactions on Internet Technology

Abstract

We can often detect from a person’s utterances whether he or she is in favor of or against a given target entity—one’s stance toward the target. However, a person may express the same stance toward a target by using negative or positive language. Here for the first time we present a dataset of tweet–target pairs annotated for both stance and sentiment. The targets may or may not be referred to in the tweets, and they may or may not be the target of opinion in the tweets. Partitions of this dataset were used as training and test sets in a SemEval-2016 shared task competition. We propose a simple stance detection system that outperforms submissions from all 19 teams that participated in the shared task. Additionally, access to both stance and sentiment annotations allows us to explore several research questions. We show that although knowing the sentiment expressed by a tweet is beneficial for stance classification, it alone is not sufficient. Finally, we use additional unlabeled data through distant supervision techniques and word embeddings to further improve stance classification.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1145/3003433

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Sentiment and opinion contained in a message are two different characteristics of the message.

    “Therefore sentiment and opinion contained in a message are two different characteristics of the message.”

    From Credibility of climate change denial in social media (2019) · cites this paper as Mohammad et al., 2017

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Mohammad, S. M., Sobhani, P., & Kiritchenko, S.
Affiliations
  • National Research Council Canada (CA)
  • University of Ottawa (CA)
Venue
ACM Transactions on Internet Technology
Published
2017-06-12
Volume
17
Issue
3
Pages
1-23
ISSN
  • 1533-5399 (ISSN-L)
  • 1557-6051
OpenAlex
W2347127863
Cited by
449
References
1
Citations by year
2026: 18 · 2025: 31 · 2024: 34 · 2023: 51 · 2022: 59 · 2021: 73 · 2020: 61 · 2019: 43 · 2018: 44 · 2017: 25 · 2016: 10
FWCI
27.28
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • ACM Transactions on Internet Technology (publishedVersion)
  • arXiv (Cornell University) (submittedVersion)
  • arXiv (Cornell University)
Funders
Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada under the CREATE program
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Sentiment Analysis and Opinion Mining
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Topic Modeling
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Hate Speech and Cyberbullying Detection
Keywords
stance detection, sentiment analysis, tweets, distant supervision, word embeddings, social media

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review