The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Proceedings of the 2nd workshop on Emotion Representations and Modelling for Companion Systems
Abstract
With the advances in computing technologies, we have been undergoing a shift towards a digital world. As an inevitable result of this shift, the technology penetrates into education in myriad forms. Intelligent tutoring systems (ITS) are essential ...
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“So far, previous research has investigated (1) postural behavior and gestures to assess phases of cognitive underload or overload [95], (2) mouse movements such as traveled distances [12] or pause/break activities [119], and (3) differences in glance duration at input modalities and output devices to solve a given task [61].”
From A Survey on Measuring Cognitive Workload in Human-Computer Interaction (2023) · cites this paper as [95]
Citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
A Survey on Measuring Cognitive Workload in Human-Computer Interaction
Kosch, T., Karolus, J., Zagermann, J., Reiterer, H., Schmidt, A., & Woźniak, P. W. (2023) · ACM Computing Surveys · doi:10.1145/3582272 · Cited by 304
Metadata
- Publisher
- ACM
- Published
- 2016-11-16
- OpenAlex
- W4245384167
- Cited by
- 2
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2025: 1 · 2019: 1
- Type
- paratext
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Intelligent Tutoring Systems and Adaptive Learning
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Emotion and Mood Recognition
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Social Robot Interaction and HRI
- Keywords
- emotion representation, emotion modeling, companion systems, intelligent tutoring systems, affective computing
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Proceedings of the 2nd workshop on Emotion Representations and Modelling for Companion Systems. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1145/3009960
- The paper
- Proceedings of the 2nd workshop on Emotion Representations and Modelling for Companion Systems. (2016). https://doi.org/10.1145/3009960
